Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/imap-upload.spec SRPM URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/imap-upload-1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: IMAP Upload is a tool for uploading a local mbox file to IMAP4 server. The most stable way to migrate to Gmail. Features include : - Read messages stored in mbox format which is used by many mail clients such as Thunderbird. - Preserve the delivery time of the message. - Automatic retry when the connection was aborted which happens frequently on Gmail. - Can write out failed messages in mbox format. rpmlint give no warning/error on spec, srpm and rpm, just said the package didn't have a man page, I will try to submit this bug in upstream. Here are the koji scratch build, they all build fine : Rawhide : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2763385 F14 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2763387 F13 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2763391 Thank you!
> Gmail Note that "Google Mail" would be less ambiguous with regard to the Gmail trademark and lawsuits like this: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/24/no_access_to_gmail_in_germany/
Spec URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/imap-upload.spec SRPM URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/imap-upload-1.2-2.fc14.src.rpm Change Gmail for Google Mail in the package description.
Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [?] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [?] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [?] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [?] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture Tested on: F14/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab@laptop023 SRPMS]$ rpmlint imap-upload-1.2-2.fc14.src.rpm imap-upload.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mbox -> box, m box, mb ox imap-upload.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mbox -> box, m box, mb ox imap-upload.src: E: unknown-key GPG#a9e6e953 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab@laptop023 noarch]$ rpmlint imap-upload-1.2-2.fc14.noarch.rpm imap-upload.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mbox -> box, m box, mb ox imap-upload.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mbox -> box, m box, mb ox imap-upload.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary imap_upload.py 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable [x] Buildroot is correct (if it's still used) master : spec file: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license License type: MIT [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL Upstream source: bd1a0ea13e0e77707c6ac87ea5240ff2 imap-upload-1.2.zip Build source: bd1a0ea13e0e77707c6ac87ea5240ff2 imap-upload-1.2.zip [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales [-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT (if it's still used) [x] Package must own all directories that it creates [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT (if it's still used) [-] Included tests passed successfully [x] Package consistently uses macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete [x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) [-] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application [-] Follows desktop entry spec [-] Valid .desktop Name [-] Valid .desktop GenericName [-] Valid .desktop Categories [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [-] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream [x] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [?] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2948449 [x] Package functions as described [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct [-] File based requires are sane [x] Changelog in allowed format - A license statement in the source header would be nice. If you ask, maybe upstream will add one. - There are many white lines in the description. Consider removing them because the graphical package management tools often only provide small areas for the description. This two thing are no blocker just annotations. Beside that I see no further blocker, package APPROVED
Thanks a lot for the review, I will talk with upstream to add a license in the source header for the future release. Also, I will remove the white line in the final spec as I haven't thought of graphical tools.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: imap-upload Short Description: A tool for uploading a local mbox file to IMAP4 server Owners: jfsaucier Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
imap-upload-1.2-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imap-upload-1.2-3.fc15
imap-upload-1.2-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imap-upload-1.2-3.fc14
imap-upload-1.2-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.
imap-upload-1.2-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.
imap-upload-1.2-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.