Bug 675821 - Rebase qpid-cpp to 0.10 for snapshot 3
Summary: Rebase qpid-cpp to 0.10 for snapshot 3
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: qpid-cpp
Version: 6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Kim van der Riet
QA Contact: MRG Quality Engineering
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 690268
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-07 21:09 UTC by Ted Ross
Modified: 2011-05-19 14:25 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: qpid-cpp-0.10-3
Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 690268 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 14:25:24 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0771 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE qpid-cpp bug fix and enhancement update 2011-05-18 18:08:34 UTC

Description Ted Ross 2011-02-07 21:09:48 UTC 
This BZ represents a request to rebase this package to the upstream 0.10 release for RHEL6.1 snapshot 3.

Rationale:

In order to support the MRG layered product on RHEL 6.1, the base components (of which this package is one) will need to be synchronized with the MRG code base.  Snapshot 3 aligns with the Apache Qpid schedule.

This action allows the MRG messaging product to align on the RHEL schedule.

Risks:

Although this is a rebase-to-upstream-version, there are no API changes planned.  We will need to analyze the ABIs to see if any of the dependent packages will need to be re-built.
Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 14:25:24 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0771.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.