Bug 679395 - Wrong settings were detected for plugin RHTSupport
Summary: Wrong settings were detected for plugin RHTSupport
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: abrt
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Denys Vlasenko
QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-22 13:35 UTC by Michal Nowak
Modified: 2013-03-08 02:11 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 12:13:35 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Trivial patch (538 bytes, patch)
2011-06-09 13:20 UTC, Denys Vlasenko 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1598 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE abrt and libreport bug fix and enhancement update 2011-12-06 00:51:16 UTC

Comment 2 Jiri Moskovcak 2011-02-22 14:44:41 UTC 
This is not a bug, the file we're shipping doesn't contain any credentials at all because it can't. Maybe the text "Wrong settings were detected for plugin RHTSupport" should be changed to something more descriptive like "Empty password or username for RHTSupport".
Comment 4 Thomas Meyer 2011-06-03 10:26:03 UTC 
Same here for Fedora 15 and abrt 2.0.1. my bugzilla user/password was empty. no problem, but this warning/error message is a bit vague.
Comment 5 Denys Vlasenko 2011-06-09 13:20:30 UTC 
Created attachment 503890 [details]
Trivial patch

Changed message to:

"Empty password or username for %s"
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 12:13:35 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1598.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.