Bug 680088 - file list qt-examples/debuginfo rpmdiff failure
Summary: file list qt-examples/debuginfo rpmdiff failure
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: qt
Version: 6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Than Ngo
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-24 10:32 UTC by Vladimir Benes
Modified: 2011-12-06 11:38 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: qt-4.6.2-19.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Due to an issue in the qt buildroot, the complexpong example was incorrectly removed for the PowerPC architecture qt-examples package, which caused that missing files were reported when qt-examples file list was verified. This issue has been fixed: the complexpong example is now correctly included for all supported architectures.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-08-18 07:26:29 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1170 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE qt bug fix update 2011-12-06 00:51:23 UTC

Description Vladimir Benes 2011-02-24 10:32:56 UTC
Description of problem:
there is some confusion in 
https://errata.devel.redhat.com/rpmdiff/show/47313?result_id=669825

for example complexpong was removed from ppc and added into ppc64

do not know if this can be somehow serious

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
qt-4.6.2-17

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-06 00:10:40 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 8 Miroslav Svoboda 2011-07-18 16:14:15 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Due to an issue in the qt buildroot, the complexpong example was incorrectly removed for the PowerPC architecture qt-examples package, which caused the rpmdiff utility to report missing files when the qt-examples file list was verified. This issue has been fixed: the complexpong example is now correctly included for all supported architectures.

Comment 10 Martin Simon 2011-07-26 14:30:25 UTC
The bug fix has been tested on all architectures
-> VERIFIED

Comment 11 Miroslav Svoboda 2011-08-03 09:42:33 UTC
    Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    Diffed Contents:
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Due to an issue in the qt buildroot, the complexpong example was incorrectly removed for the PowerPC architecture qt-examples package, which caused the rpmdiff utility to report missing files when the qt-examples file list was verified. This issue has been fixed: the complexpong example is now correctly included for all supported architectures.+Due to an issue in the qt buildroot, the complexpong example was incorrectly removed for the PowerPC architecture qt-examples package, which caused that missing files were reported when qt-examples file list was verified. This issue has been fixed: the complexpong example is now correctly included for all supported architectures.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2011-08-18 07:26:29 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1170.html

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 11:38:38 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1170.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.