Bug 680150 - RHDS Documentation: Example in section 2.1.1.3 is wrong
Summary: RHDS Documentation: Example in section 2.1.1.3 is wrong
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Directory Server
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Doc-administration-guide
Version: 8.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: DSDocs
: ---
Assignee: Andrew Ross
QA Contact: ecs-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 434914 639035
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-24 13:52 UTC by Diego Woitasen
Modified: 2013-10-20 22:21 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-05 22:38:27 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Diego Woitasen 2011-02-24 13:52:14 UTC 
Description of problem:
The example about how to create a database for a sub suffix is wrong. The '\' in the cn breaks database creation.

There are no syntax error from DS but the database is not created correctly.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHDS 8.2 Documentation

Correct example:
dn: cn=ou=groups\,dc=example\,dc=com,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
objectclass: top
objectclass: extensibleObject
objectclass: nsMappingTree
nsslapd-state: backend
nsslapd-backend: GroupData
nsslapd-parent-suffix: dc=example,dc=com
cn: ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com                  <--- The example has backslashes here.
Comment 1 Deon Ballard 2011-02-25 17:58:27 UTC 
This example should be fixed now:

http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.2/html/Administration_Guide/Configuring_Directory_Databases.html#Creating_Suffixes-Creating_Root_and_Sub_Suffixes_from_the_Command_Line

Thanks for the correction!
Comment 2 Diego Woitasen 2011-02-25 18:19:37 UTC 
Yes, it's fine now.

Thanks!
Comment 3 Deon Ballard 2011-03-04 19:13:15 UTC 
These bugs were all fixed in the 8.2 cycle and just need to be verified and closed.
Comment 4 Nathan Kinder 2011-03-15 16:40:20 UTC 
The doc changes look good.  This can be closed.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.