Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 68028 - rpm -Fvh didn't
rpm -Fvh didn't
Product: Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification: Retired
Component: rpm (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeff Johnson
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2002-07-05 10:16 EDT by Tim Waugh
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:38 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2002-07-05 10:16:23 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Tim Waugh 2002-07-05 10:16:19 EDT
Description of Problem:   
When I was trying to freshen a package, rpm did nothing. 
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):   
How Reproducible:   
Not sure.  Here's what I did: 
I had patchutils-0.2.14-3 installed, according to 'rpm -q patchutils'. 
I had just built patchutils-0.2.15pre1-0.1.i386.rpm. 
I did: rpm -Fvh patchutils-0.2.15pre1-0.1.i386.rpm. 
Nothing happened. 
I did: rpm -Uvh patchutils-0.2.15pre1-0.1.i386.rpm. 
The package was upgraded. 
Now 'rpm -q patchutils' says: patchutils-0.2.15pre1-0.1 
So, rpm seems happy that the newer package is indeed new, and it was telling 
me that the older package was installed, and yet rpm -F didn't want to do 
Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 2002-07-05 10:20:38 EDT
Yup, look for rpm-4.1-0.41.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.