Hide Forgot
Description of problem: drop to shell, or in a installed rhev-hypervisor, run pvs/lvs/vgs, #pvs File descriptor 3(/etc/default/ovirt.augnew(deleted)) leaked on pvs invocation.Parent PID 12152:/bin/bash File descriptor 4(/etc/default/ovirt.augnew(deleted)) leaked on pvs invocation.Parent PID 12152:/bin/bash File descriptor 5(/etc/default/ovirt.augnew(deleted)) leaked on pvs invocation.Parent PID 12152:/bin/bash File descriptor 3(/tmp/ffimA476v(deleted)) leaked on pvs invocation.Parent PID 12152:/bin/bash notice, as this is output to stderr, so if you ssh to the server, you can't see this message, [root@amd-1216-8-5 ~]# pvs 2>/dev/null PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree /dev/mapper/1ATA WDC WD2502ABYS-18B7A0 WD-WCAT19563677p2 HostVG lvm2 a- 232.78g 222.18g Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 6.1-8 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.just run pvs/vgs/lvs 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
rhev-hypervisor 6.2-0.14, as comment 5 mention, this is just a workaround, to suppress the warnings, [root@hp-slot2-eth0 log]# pvs PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree /dev/cciss/c0d0p3 HostVG lvm2 a- 67.86g 0 [root@hp-slot2-eth0 log]# lvs v LV VG Attr LSize Origin Snap% Move Log Copy% Convert Config HostVG -wi-ao 8.00m Data HostVG -wi-ao 58.00g Logging HostVG -wi-ao 2.00g Swap HostVG -wi-ao 7.84g [root@hp-slot2-eth0 log]# vgs VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree HostVG 1 4 0 wz--n- 67.86g 0 [root@hp-slot2-eth0 log]# lvscan ACTIVE '/dev/HostVG/Swap' [7.84 GiB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/HostVG/Config' [8.00 MiB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/HostVG/Logging' [2.00 GiB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/HostVG/Data' [58.00 GiB] inherit [root@hp-slot2-eth0 log]# pvscan PV /dev/cciss/c0d0p3 VG HostVG lvm2 [67.86 GiB / 0 free] Total: 1 [67.86 GiB] / in use: 1 [67.86 GiB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ]
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1783.html