Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
The "Cluster Administration" documentation under "Appendix B. HA Resource Parameters" refers to "Resource" - Samba with "Resource Agent" - smb.sh.
As far as I can see smb.sh doesn't ship with RHEL6 (but RA samba.sh does).
Not sure whether smb.sh or samba.sh is preferred, or is one newer?
So I'd have thought, either the documentation should document the newer (if it is) samba.sh. Or smb.sh should be in the package.
Also I'm not sure if lucci is doing the right thing on Samba resources on this. It has a configuration option "Workgroup" which is not referred to in the samba.sh resources.
Thanks for reporting. Resource agent 'samba.sh' is a newer one and documentation should be fixed.
Workgroup is not a parameter for samba resource-agent as we used information from samba configuration file now. If you think that it is a bug in lucci please create a new bz for that (one bug can be part of just one component).
In my working draft of the 6.1 version of the Cluster Admin Guide, I have now replaced the reference to smb.sh with samba.sh and I have removed the reference to the Workgroup parameter.
In general I still need to verify that the rest of these tables are up to date, but for now I have updated the out-of-date Samba resource script name.