Bug 682929 - [abrt] wireshark-gnome-1.4.3-1.fc14: packet_list_compare_records: Process /usr/sbin/wireshark was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] wireshark-gnome-1.4.3-1.fc14: packet_list_compare_records: Process /us...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: wireshark
Version: 14
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Radek Vokál
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:a4bd59bc605857b463647a330b6...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-08 02:58 UTC by fyi8254
Modified: 2011-06-09 14:08 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-06-09 14:08:18 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (32.68 KB, text/plain)
2011-03-08 02:58 UTC, fyi8254
no flags Details

Description fyi8254 2011-03-08 02:58:44 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.17
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace, 33461 bytes
cmdline: wireshark
comment: I noticed when running top that kryptd was using about 43% of CPU at time of crash (since I have 2 cpus this probably means it was using almost all of one core I think).  I have never seen it as high as that before - when transferring large files between disks before about 15% very roughly is the highest I remember ever seeing it.  Don't know if this is significant or not.
component: wireshark
Attached file: coredump, 1211326464 bytes
crash_function: packet_list_compare_records
executable: /usr/sbin/wireshark
kernel: 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64
package: wireshark-gnome-1.4.3-1.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/sbin/wireshark was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1299552018
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1.  Take a (large? ~ 800MB) capture on a machine using luks encryption for the whole filesystem (except /boot of course), filter it to show only a small (94?) number of packets
2.  Click on the column to sort it (by MAC address?)
3.  Press stop because it is taking too long (i didn't expect it to sort all packets including those not displayed)
4.  Change to another workspace to run top command

Comment 1 fyi8254 2011-03-08 02:58:51 UTC
Created attachment 482826 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Jan Safranek 2011-04-13 11:03:45 UTC
Can you share the 'big' capture? It seems it is not reproducible with just any big pcap file.

Comment 3 Radek Vokál 2011-06-09 14:08:18 UTC
Wireshark was recently updated to wireshark-1.4.7-1.fc14, please reopen this bug if you still see this issue.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.