Bug 683357 - [RFE] Have KVM guests be IPMI-manageable
Summary: [RFE] Have KVM guests be IPMI-manageable
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: qemu-kvm
Version: 6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Virtualization Maintenance
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 607248 756082
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-09 09:02 UTC by J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Modified: 2018-11-14 16:44 UTC (History)
14 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-11-30 19:38:02 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Legacy) 48936 0 None None None Never

Description J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) 2011-03-09 09:02:24 UTC
What is the nature and description of the request?
>> Customer would like to add IPMI / SOL support to KVM guests.

Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
>> ability to manage and monitor all RHEL servers the same way regardless of
>> platform. My initial interest was power management for RHCS fencing and
>> SOL for remote console access. However, having all/most of IPMI supported
>> would allow much more flexibility in management and monitoring.

How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
>> IPMI and SOL support at the KVM guest level to match that already
>> available with physical hosts.
>> Monitor / Management (IPMI)
>> Remote Console (SOL)
>> Remote power management.

For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat
and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully
implemented.
>> All features can be tested using system management technology that
>> leverages IPMI and SOL technologies.  Customer currently uses management
>> tools from BMC.

Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat bugzilla?
>> Not to my knowledge

How quickly does this need resolved? (desired target release)
>> Customer would like to take advantage of this functionality as soon as
>> possible as Cloud and Virtualization become mainstream within their
>> environment. Preferred release vehicle would be a dot release in RHEL 6
>> (6.2 if possible).

Does this request meet the RHEL Inclusion criteria (please review)
>> Yes

List the affected packages
>> Not certain in this case, may be kernel drivers or aspects of libvirt or
>> a combination of them both.

Comment 4 Dor Laor 2011-06-16 14:59:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> What is the nature and description of the request?
> >> Customer would like to add IPMI / SOL support to KVM guests.
> 
> Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
> >> ability to manage and monitor all RHEL servers the same way regardless of
> >> platform. My initial interest was power management for RHCS fencing and

We do have a mechanism for watchdog devices i6300esb/ib700

> >> SOL for remote console access. However, having all/most of IPMI supported
> >> would allow much more flexibility in management and monitoring.

Remote console can be setup using some mgmt daemon on the host getting the input/output from the virtual serial line

Would that be acceptable?

> 
> How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements
> here)
> >> IPMI and SOL support at the KVM guest level to match that already
> >> available with physical hosts.
> >> Monitor / Management (IPMI)
> >> Remote Console (SOL)
> >> Remote power management.
> 
> For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat
> and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully
> implemented.
> >> All features can be tested using system management technology that
> >> leverages IPMI and SOL technologies.  Customer currently uses management
> >> tools from BMC.
> 
> Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat bugzilla?
> >> Not to my knowledge
> 
> How quickly does this need resolved? (desired target release)
> >> Customer would like to take advantage of this functionality as soon as
> >> possible as Cloud and Virtualization become mainstream within their
> >> environment. Preferred release vehicle would be a dot release in RHEL 6
> >> (6.2 if possible).
> 
> Does this request meet the RHEL Inclusion criteria (please review)
> >> Yes
> 
> List the affected packages
> >> Not certain in this case, may be kernel drivers or aspects of libvirt or
> >> a combination of them both.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.