Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dbus-1.2.24-3.el6.ppc64 dbus-devel-1.2.24-3.el6.ppc64 dbus-glib-0.86-5.el6.ppc64 dbus-libs-1.2.24-3.el6.ppc64 dbus-python-0.83.0-6.1.el6.ppc64 eggdbus-0.6-3.el6.ppc64 fprintd-0.1-19.git04fd09cfa.el6.ppc64 fprintd-pam-0.1-19.git04fd09cfa.el6.ppc64 selinux-policy-3.7.19-78.el6.noarch selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-78.el6.noarch selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-78.el6.noarch selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-78.el6.noarch selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-78.el6.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1) get a RHEL-6.1 machine with active MLS policy 2) log in as root via console 3) run following commands: # sestatus SELinux status: enabled SELinuxfs mount: /selinux Current mode: enforcing Mode from config file: enforcing Policy version: 24 Policy from config file: mls # id -Z root:sysadm_r:sysadm_t:SystemLow-SystemHigh # newrole -r secadm_r Password: # id -Z root:secadm_r:secadm_t:SystemLow-SystemHigh # exit logout # id -Z root:sysadm_r:sysadm_t:SystemLow-SystemHigh Actual results: ---- time->Thu Mar 10 15:52:57 2011 type=USER_AVC msg=audit(1299790377.360:197): user pid=1215 uid=81 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0-s15:c0.c1023 msg='avc: denied { send_msg } for msgtype=method_call interface=net.reactivated.Fprint.Manager member=GetDefaultDevice dest=net.reactivated.Fprint spid=3154 tpid=3156 scontext=root:sysadm_r:newrole_t:s0-s15:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:system_r:fprintd_t:s0-s15:c0.c1023 tclass=dbus : exe="/bin/dbus-daemon" sauid=81 hostname=? addr=? terminal=?' ---- Expected results: no AVCs
How Dan said, we should fix it on non mls machines.
Yes fprintd should not be installed on MLS boxes. We have this policy in F15
Fixed in selinux-policy-3.7.19-79.el6
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0526.html