684370 – [abrt] kernel: WARNING: at drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c:1070 ehci_endpoint_reset+0x103/0x110() (Not tainted)

Bug 684370 - [abrt] kernel: WARNING: at drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c:1070 ehci_endpoint_reset+0x103/0x110() (Not tainted)

Summary: [abrt] kernel: WARNING: at drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c:1070 ehci_endpoint_res...

Keywords:
Status:	CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias:	None
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	kernel
Sub Component:
Version:	6.0
Hardware:	i686
OS:	Unspecified
Priority:	medium
Severity:	medium
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Assignee:	Don Zickus
QA Contact:	Red Hat Kernel QE team
Docs Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:	abrt_hash:1948559417
Duplicates (3):	675731 694091 714651 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+	depends on / blocked

Reported:	2011-03-11 23:51 UTC by Red Hat Case Diagnostics
Modified:	2018-11-14 20:59 UTC (History)
CC List:	4 users (show)
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-10-05 21:53:08 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (1.66 KB, text/plain) 2011-03-11 23:51 UTC, Red Hat Case Diagnostics	no flags	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Red Hat Case Diagnostics 2011-03-11 23:51:06 UTC

This description generated by Andreas from an ABRT report
architecture: i686
cmdline: not_applicable
comment: Not sure
component: kernel
executable: kernel
kernel: 2.6.32-71.el6.i686
package: kernel
reason: WARNING: at drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c:1070 ehci_endpoint_reset+0x103/0x110() (Not tainted)
release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation release 6.0 (Santiago)
reproduce: Once again, I don't know what happened. The computer appears to be working fine, so I'm not sure
what prompted this "kernel crash" error. 

time: 1299534694
uid: 0
backtrace: WARNING: at drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c:1070 ehci_endpoint_reset+0x103/0x110() (Not tainted)
Hardware name: Precision WorkStation T3400  
clear_halt for a busy endpoint
Modules linked in: aes_i586 aes_generic xts gf128mul dm_crypt vfat fat usb_storage vboxnetadp(U) vboxnetflt(U) vboxdrv(U) sit tunnel4 fuse autofs4 sunrpc p4_clockmod ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 iptable_filter ip_tables ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables ipv6 dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log uinput ppdev parport_pc parport sg dcdbas serio_raw i2c_i801 iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support tg3 snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc x38_edac edac_core ext3 jbd mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod crc_t10dif ahci nouveau ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit video output i2c_core dm_mod [last unloaded: microcode]
Pid: 15060, comm: VirtualBox Not tainted 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 #1
Call Trace:
[<c04501c1>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xc0
[<c07057d3>] ? ehci_endpoint_reset+0x103/0x110
[<c07057d3>] ? ehci_endpoint_reset+0x103/0x110
[<c0450293>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x33/0x40
[<c07057d3>] ? ehci_endpoint_reset+0x103/0x110
[<c06eba5e>] ? usb_hcd_reset_endpoint+0x1e/0x70
[<c06f0227>] ? usb_clear_halt+0x67/0x70
[<c06f8ced>] ? usbdev_ioctl+0x43d/0x13e0
[<fab0ae8e>] ? rtR0MemAlloc+0x2e/0x80 [vboxdrv]
[<fab028b9>] ? supdrvIOCtlFast+0x59/0x90 [vboxdrv]
[<fab0236c>] ? VBoxDrvLinuxIOCtl+0x13c/0x1e0 [vboxdrv]
[<c052db79>] ? vfs_ioctl+0x89/0xa0
[<c052dcec>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x6c/0x5c0
[<c052e2b6>] ? sys_ioctl+0x76/0x90
[<c04a9656>] ? audit_syscall_exit+0x216/0x240
[<c04099fb>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28

Comment 1 Red Hat Case Diagnostics 2011-03-11 23:51:26 UTC

Created attachment 483853 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 4 Don Zickus 2011-03-25 03:16:11 UTC

*** Bug 675731 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 RHEL Program Management 2011-04-04 02:40:54 UTC

Since RHEL 6.1 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 6 Don Zickus 2011-04-05 20:22:27 UTC

Are you able to reproduce this without the virtualbox module loaded?

Cheers,
Don

Comment 8 Don Zickus 2011-09-07 02:54:22 UTC

*** Bug 714651 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Don Zickus 2011-09-07 02:55:24 UTC

*** Bug 694091 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Jeremy West 2011-10-05 21:53:08 UTC

Closing this bug, since the associated customer case has closed.  Please feel free to re-open this if new information becomes available.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.