now that the 2.2.7 clone is in errata 10920, this bug is useless

actually, THIS is the clone that should be in the erratum

    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
On certain occasions pool_description field is removed from storage domain metadata. This problem will be dealt with in bug 676582. Storage domains with missing pool_description used to fail connection to storage pool. This fix returns an empty description instead of failing the operation.

verified by Daniel yesterday by mistake we've moved the 2.2.7 bug instead to verified.

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0358.html

    Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    Diffed Contents:
@@ -1 +1 @@
-On certain occasions pool_description field is removed from storage domain metadata. This problem will be dealt with in bug 676582. Storage domains with missing pool_description used to fail connection to storage pool. This fix returns an empty description instead of failing the operation.+In certain cases, the "POOL_DESCRIPTION" field was removed from the storage domain metadata. As a result, storage domains with a missing "POOL_DESCRIPTION" field failed to connect to a storage pool. With this update, an empty description is used in the "POOL_DESCRIPTION" field when the field is undefined, thus, no longer causing failures to connect.