Bug 688576 - [abrt] xfce4-power-manager-1.0.3-1.fc15: g_type_check_instance_is_a: Process /usr/bin/xfce4-power-manager was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] xfce4-power-manager-1.0.3-1.fc15: g_type_check_instance_is_a: Process ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 714519
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: xfce4-power-manager
Version: 15
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christoph Wickert
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:aa4579490915273c3548883d7fe...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-17 11:55 UTC by Horst H. von Brand
Modified: 2011-10-06 21:12 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-10-06 21:12:19 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (16.97 KB, text/plain)
2011-03-17 11:55 UTC, Horst H. von Brand 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Horst H. von Brand 2011-03-17 11:55:29 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.17
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace, 17377 bytes
cmdline: xfce4-power-manager
component: xfce4-power-manager
Attached file: coredump, 12017664 bytes
crash_function: g_type_check_instance_is_a
executable: /usr/bin/xfce4-power-manager
kernel: 2.6.38-1.fc15.x86_64
package: xfce4-power-manager-1.0.3-1.fc15
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/xfce4-power-manager was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 15 (Lovelock)
time: 1300362312
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1. Started my XFCE session, after removing the intel_ips kernel module from tty2
2.
3.
Comment 1 Horst H. von Brand 2011-03-17 11:55:32 UTC 
Created attachment 485990 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Christoph Wickert 2011-03-25 00:01:18 UTC 
Can you reproduce this crash or is it random?
Comment 3 Christoph Wickert 2011-06-11 22:51:41 UTC 
Hi Horst, any news here? Does xfce4-power-manager crash every time you remove the kernel module?
Comment 4 Christoph Wickert 2011-10-06 21:12:19 UTC 
No feedback. Closing as duplicate because we have more info in bug 714519.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 714519 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.