Bug 688788 - [REG][6.1] "awatch" subcommand of gdb does not work
Summary: [REG][6.1] "awatch" subcommand of gdb does not work
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gdb
Version: 6.1
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jan Kratochvil
QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 541866
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-18 02:05 UTC by Masayoshi Yamazaki
Modified: 2018-11-14 13:50 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gdb-7.2-46.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
On the i686 architecture, the awatch and rwatch commands printed an error when entered before the program-to-be-debugged started. GDB now by default debugs on the native architecture and the commands can be used before the program-to-be-debugged starts.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 13:48:51 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0638 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE gdb bug fix and enhancement update 2011-05-18 17:55:45 UTC

Comment 5 Eva Kopalova 2011-04-05 15:59:33 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
On the i686 architecture, the awatch and rwatch commands printed an error when entered before the program-to-be-debugged started. GDB now by default debugs on the native architecture and the commands can be used before the program-to-be-debugged starts.
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 13:48:51 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0638.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.