Bug 689279 - [abrt] evolution-data-server-2.32.2-1.fc14: __libc_message: Process /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] evolution-data-server-2.32.2-1.fc14: __libc_message: Process /usr/libe...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution-data-server
Version: 14
Hardware: i686
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:dac5211a47ce187b384a4cfc3ca...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-20 19:38 UTC by Jan Teichmann
Modified: 2011-03-21 08:14 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-03-21 08:14:32 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (29.28 KB, text/plain)
2011-03-20 19:38 UTC, Jan Teichmann 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
GNOME Bugzilla 645373 0 None None None Never

Description Jan Teichmann 2011-03-20 19:38:56 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.17
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace, 29987 bytes
cmdline: /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory
component: evolution-data-server
Attached file: coredump, 112566272 bytes
crash_function: __libc_message
executable: /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory
kernel: 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686
package: evolution-data-server-2.32.2-1.fc14
rating: 3
reason: Process /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
How to reproduce: I pressed on group reply and closed the composing window
time: 1300649734
uid: 500
Comment 1 Jan Teichmann 2011-03-20 19:38:59 UTC 
Created attachment 486504 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Milan Crha 2011-03-21 08:14:32 UTC 
Thanks for a bug report. I moved this upstream as [1]. Please see [1] for any further updates. If possible, please CC yourself there, in case upstream developers will have additional questions.

[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645373
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.