Bug 69028 - should apacheconf package be renamed?
Summary: should apacheconf package be renamed?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: apacheconf
Version: limbo
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Phil Knirsch
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 67218
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-07-17 09:23 UTC by Michael Young
Modified: 2015-03-05 01:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-07-18 01:51:53 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michael Young 2002-07-17 09:23:49 UTC 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.78 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.9 sun4u)

Description of problem:
Since the apache package has been renamed to httpd, and there seems to be a
trend for milan to rename redhat's somethingconf packages to
redhat-config-something, should the apacheconf package be renamed?
Comment 1 Phil Knirsch 2002-07-17 14:16:59 UTC 
I already talked with Tammy about it and will do it either tomorrow or on
Friday, so don't worry about it, Jonathan. ;-)

Read ya, Phil
Comment 2 Phil Knirsch 2002-07-30 14:10:25 UTC 
Done. Rawhide now contains a redhat-config-httpd package instead of apacheconf.

Read ya, Phil
Comment 3 Michael Fulbright 2002-12-20 17:38:25 UTC 
Time tracking values updated
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.