Hide Forgot
Facts: 1. /etc/sysconfig/sandbox file is part of policycoreutils package. 2. /usr/share/man/man5/sandbox.conf.5.gz is part of policycoreutils-sandbox package. Assumption: Because sandbox option -C does not expect an argument and there is no other option which expects an alternative configuration file, I believe that sandbox.conf.5.gz is meant to describe /etc/sysconfig/sandbox file. Description of problem: 1. Either the name of the man page is misleading (extra .conf) or the name of the config file is misleading (missing .conf). 2. The config file and its man page should be present in the same package. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): policycoreutils-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0 policycoreutils-debuginfo-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0 policycoreutils-gui-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0 policycoreutils-newrole-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0 policycoreutils-python-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0 policycoreutils-sandbox-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0 How reproducible: always Actual results: (described above) Expected results: 1) the name of the man page is in sync with the name of the configuration file 2) the configuration file and its man page are part of the same package.
Changed man page to be sabndbox.5.gz and moved it into the main package. Fixed in policycoreutils-2.0.83-19.2.el6
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1637.html