From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020513 Description of problem: Please include the anjuta programming ide: http://anjuta.sourceforge.net BTW: What component should I select when I file an RFE for a new package in bugzilla? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. http://anjuta.sourceforge.net 2. 3. Additional info:
I think the right component is "distribution", but I'm not totally sure. Is Anjuta really in usable state yet? Are you using it to write code on a daily basis?
It's stable enough for me. The developers plan to release version 1.0 soon. I'm running anjuta-0.1.9 under Red Hat 7.3. I got an rpm from freshrpms.net as I've heard that there is a problem with Red Hat 7.3's gettext package when trying to compile anjuta. Reading the anjuta mailing list indicates that the CVS version is even much more advanced and bug free. Hope to see version 1.0 real soon.
I'm sort of inclined to wait for 1.0, it's basically too late for the next Red Hat release anyhow.
I would have liked to include it, but I believe it's too late for this release.
*** Bug 77665 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 80910 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
anjuta team has released versione 1.0.1 !
Please consider adding also devhelp, which is used by Anjuta IDE for Help system (http://devhelp.codefactory.se) PS don't forget all the devhelp books! :-) Thanks.
anjuta 1.0.2 released...
I have been using Anjuta since it hit 1.0 (and have been doing incremental updates via CVS). It is an extremely well-built IDE that integrates well (better so than KDevelop) with the development utilities that are available with every Red Hat distribution. I also nominate this package as it is a very good one!
It'd be nice to see the anjuta 1 vs. anjuta 2 issue sorted out
Again I vote to include Anjuta.
Havoc, Anjuta's at 1.1.97 now. I have been using it for a couple weeks now, and have thoroughly enjoyed the improvements in functionality not to mention the fact that is migrated to Gnome 2. The source RPM package they provide works well with Red Hat Linux 9 (compiles without a problem). Anjuta 1.9.7 requires libraries already present in Rawhide. It's quite near the 1.2.0 release, but stable enough now to be useful for the masses. With its active development staff, Anjuta is sure to continue to improve, be enhanced, without the expense of a huge bloated, slow application.
If 1.1.97 is stable enough, they should really release 1.2... 1.1.97 says to me that the upstream developers consider it not ready to ship. Anjuta seems like a good package for an external developer to own, getting it into Fedora would be a nice start toward including it.
It is already in Fedora: http://www.fedora.us/pkglists/9/unstable/anjuta-1.1.97-0.fdr.1.rh90.src.rpm.html
Cool. So the blocking issue is just us doing a scalable infrastructure for including external packages, which should evolve over the next months.
*** Bug 129559 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Closing as wontfix, Extras is the proper place.