Bug 692832 - /sbin/umount.hal relies on libraries from /usr
Summary: /sbin/umount.hal relies on libraries from /usr
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: hal
Version: 6.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Richard Hughes
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 697570 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-04-01 10:34 UTC by Vladimir Benes
Modified: 2011-10-10 12:41 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-05 18:55:02 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Vladimir Benes 2011-04-01 10:34:29 UTC
Description of problem:
hal-0.5.14-11.el6.x86_64: /sbin/umount.hal relies on libs in /usr: 
libhal.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libhal.so.1 (0x00007f5e3c13b000) 
libhal-storage.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libhal-storage.so.1 (0x00007f5e3bf31000) 

this can possibly cause some issues if /usr is on different partition.. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
hal-0.5.14-10.el6.i686


Expected results:
move umount.hal to /usr/sbin or those libraries to /lib 

Additional info:
I've moved umount.hal to /usr/sbin and will see if anything goes wrong over the time

Comment 1 Richard Hughes 2011-06-08 15:27:33 UTC
*** Bug 697570 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Richard Hughes 2011-06-08 15:28:38 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> hal-0.5.14-11.el6.x86_64: /sbin/umount.hal relies on libs in /usr: 
> libhal.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libhal.so.1 (0x00007f5e3c13b000) 
> libhal-storage.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libhal-storage.so.1 (0x00007f5e3bf31000) 
> 
> this can possibly cause some issues if /usr is on different partition.. 

I'm not sure we've ever supported that on RHEL 5 or 6

> I've moved umount.hal to /usr/sbin and will see if anything goes wrong over the
> time

Did this work?

Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-05 18:55:02 UTC
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.