Bug 693041 - [WHQL] Virtio block job of "Sleep Stress With IO" for win2k8-32 fails with BSOD with MSI=0 (non default GA settings)
Summary: [WHQL] Virtio block job of "Sleep Stress With IO" for win2k8-32 fails with BS...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: virtio-win
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Vadim Rozenfeld
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-04-02 07:30 UTC by dawu
Modified: 2014-07-11 06:52 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Do not document
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 21:17:12 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
win2k8-32-blk-sleepstress-BSOD (22.29 KB, image/png)
2011-04-02 07:31 UTC, dawu
no flags Details
virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-9 vfd (1.41 MB, application/octet-stream)
2011-04-04 17:37 UTC, Vadim Rozenfeld
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1542 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE virtio-win bug fix update 2011-12-07 02:13:14 UTC

Comment 1 dawu 2011-04-02 07:31:30 UTC
Created attachment 489554 [details]
win2k8-32-blk-sleepstress-BSOD

Comment 2 Qunfang Zhang 2011-04-02 07:35:31 UTC
Hi, Vadim
This bug is failed on win2k8-32 for 3 times, we will try to continue re-test in
the mean while please help check it because it maybe a test blocker if if
always failed.

Comment 4 Vadim Rozenfeld 2011-04-02 07:49:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hi, Vadim
> This bug is failed on win2k8-32 for 3 times, we will try to continue re-test in
> the mean while please help check it because it maybe a test blocker if if
> always failed.

Hi, Qunfang
Has it passed on other platforms?

Comment 5 Qunfang Zhang 2011-04-02 07:58:05 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Hi, Vadim
> > This bug is failed on win2k8-32 for 3 times, we will try to continue re-test in
> > the mean while please help check it because it maybe a test blocker if if
> > always failed.
> 
> Hi, Qunfang
> Has it passed on other platforms?

Only run virtio block for win2k8-R2 and winxp currently, it passed.
"sleep stress" also passed for win2k3-64-balloon, win2k8-64-serial, win7-32
serial and so on.
The failed win2k8-32-blk is a fresh image copied from a backup.
But maybe we have re-install again to re-test.

Comment 6 Qunfang Zhang 2011-04-02 08:00:28 UTC
And win2k8-32 whql block testing is passed smoothly on virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-8.

Comment 7 Vadim Rozenfeld 2011-04-02 08:39:24 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > Hi, Vadim
> > > This bug is failed on win2k8-32 for 3 times, we will try to continue re-test in
> > > the mean while please help check it because it maybe a test blocker if if
> > > always failed.
> > 
> > Hi, Qunfang
> > Has it passed on other platforms?
> 
> Only run virtio block for win2k8-R2 and winxp currently, it passed.
> "sleep stress" also passed for win2k3-64-balloon, win2k8-64-serial, win7-32
> serial and so on.
Yes, but what about viostor on other platforms, like win2k8-64 for example?
> The failed win2k8-32-blk is a fresh image copied from a backup.
> But maybe we have re-install again to re-test.

Yes, please try it on a freshly installed system.
The only difference between virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-8 and -0.1-9
is in MSISupported flag. It is the same binaries with the same
power management support.

Comment 8 RHEL Program Management 2011-04-04 01:46:15 UTC
Since RHEL 6.1 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 9 Qunfang Zhang 2011-04-04 06:35:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > > Hi, Vadim
> > > > This bug is failed on win2k8-32 for 3 times, we will try to continue re-test in
> > > > the mean while please help check it because it maybe a test blocker if if
> > > > always failed.
> > > 
> > > Hi, Qunfang
> > > Has it passed on other platforms?
> > 
> > Only run virtio block for win2k8-R2 and winxp currently, it passed.
> > "sleep stress" also passed for win2k3-64-balloon, win2k8-64-serial, win7-32
> > serial and so on.
> Yes, but what about viostor on other platforms, like win2k8-64 for example?

win2k8-64 failed with the same BSOD. I will re-test with MSI=1 again.

> > The failed win2k8-32-blk is a fresh image copied from a backup.
> > But maybe we have re-install again to re-test.
> 
> Yes, please try it on a freshly installed system.
> The only difference between virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-8 and -0.1-9
> is in MSISupported flag. It is the same binaries with the same
> power management support.

Re-installed a fresh win2k8-32 image and retest, failed with the same BSOD.
Enable MSI and re-run, passed.  Disable again and run, failed.

Comment 10 Vadim Rozenfeld 2011-04-04 17:37:37 UTC
Created attachment 489819 [details]
virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-9 vfd

attached please find a virtual floppy disk image,
which contains virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-9 viostor 
drivers.

Comment 11 Vadim Rozenfeld 2011-04-04 17:54:24 UTC
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created attachment 489819 [details]
> virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-9 vfd
> 
> attached please find a virtual floppy disk image,
> which contains virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-9 viostor 
> drivers.

Hi, Qunfang

Could you please git it a shot. I ran
"Sleep Stress With IO" on my freshly
installed win2k8-32 VM without any problem.

Best regards,
Vadim.

Comment 12 Qunfang Zhang 2011-04-05 02:24:27 UTC
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > Created attachment 489819 [details]
> > virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-9 vfd
> > 
> > attached please find a virtual floppy disk image,
> > which contains virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-9 viostor 
> > drivers.
> 
> Hi, Qunfang
> 
> Could you please git it a shot. I ran
> "Sleep Stress With IO" on my freshly
> installed win2k8-32 VM without any problem.
> 
> Best regards,
> Vadim.

OK, we will try it.

Comment 13 dawu 2011-04-06 06:48:35 UTC
Hi Vadim,

I retested this issue on win2k8-32 with updating driver to the one from vfd file,sleep stress still got the same BSOD and job failed.

Currently I'm trying to install a fresh image with newly installing driver from vfd, and update the result.

Best Regards,
Dawn

Comment 14 Vadim Rozenfeld 2011-04-06 07:28:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #13)
> Hi Vadim,
> 
> I retested this issue on win2k8-32 with updating driver to the one from vfd
> file,sleep stress still got the same BSOD and job failed.
> 

Hi Dawn,
Do you have the crash dump?
I'd like to see it.
Thank you,
Vadim.

> Currently I'm trying to install a fresh image with newly installing driver from
> vfd, and update the result.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Dawn

Comment 15 dawu 2011-04-06 09:08:39 UTC
Hi Vadim,

I retest this job with fresh image and installing driver directly from vfd
file, and with default setting MSI=0,this job still fail with BSOD happened. 

CLI:

/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -m 6G -smp 4 -cpu cpu64-rhel6,+x2apic -usbdevice tablet
-drive
file=win2k8-32-sp2-bugverification.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio0,boot=on,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
-device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio0,id=virtio-blk-pci0 -netdev
tap,id=hostnet0,script=/etc/qemu-ifup -device
e1000,netdev=hostnet0,mac=00:10:1a:12:31:16,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4 -boot c -uuid
d247b32c-0160-4000-ad78-437ee59281a0 -rtc-td-hack -no-kvm-pit-reinjection
-chardev
socket,id=111a,path=/tmp/monitor-win2k8-32-sp2-bugverification-vfd,server,nowait
-mon chardev=111a,mode=readline -name win2k8-32-blk-9-bugverification-vfd -vnc
:1 -drive
file=disk1.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio1,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
-device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio1,id=virtio-blk-pci1 -drive
file=disk2.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio2,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
-device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio2,id=virtio-blk-pci2 -drive
file=disk3.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio3,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
-device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio3,id=virtio-blk-pci3 -drive
file=disk4.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio4,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
-device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio4,id=virtio-blk-pci4

Best Regards,
Dawn

Comment 24 Vadim Rozenfeld 2011-04-06 12:37:36 UTC
(In reply to comment #15)
> Hi Vadim,
> 
> I retest this job with fresh image and installing driver directly from vfd
> file, and with default setting MSI=0,this job still fail with BSOD happened. 
> 
> CLI:
> 
> /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -m 6G -smp 4 -cpu cpu64-rhel6,+x2apic -usbdevice tablet
> -drive
> file=win2k8-32-sp2-bugverification.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio0,boot=on,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio0,id=virtio-blk-pci0 -netdev
> tap,id=hostnet0,script=/etc/qemu-ifup -device
> e1000,netdev=hostnet0,mac=00:10:1a:12:31:16,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4 -boot c -uuid
> d247b32c-0160-4000-ad78-437ee59281a0 -rtc-td-hack -no-kvm-pit-reinjection
> -chardev
> socket,id=111a,path=/tmp/monitor-win2k8-32-sp2-bugverification-vfd,server,nowait
> -mon chardev=111a,mode=readline -name win2k8-32-blk-9-bugverification-vfd -vnc
> :1 -drive
> file=disk1.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio1,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio1,id=virtio-blk-pci1 -drive
> file=disk2.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio2,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio2,id=virtio-blk-pci2 -drive
> file=disk3.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio3,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio3,id=virtio-blk-pci3 -drive
> file=disk4.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio4,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio4,id=virtio-blk-pci4
> 
> Best Regards,
> Dawn


Here's mine:

sudo /home/vrozenfe/work/troubles/qemu-kvm-rhel6/x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -M rhel6.0.0 -m 1G -smp 2 -cpu qemu64,+x2apic -usbdevice tablet -drive file=/home/vrozenfe/work/images/w2k8-dtm-client.qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio0,boot=on,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio0,id=virtio-blk-pci0 -netdev tap,id=hostnet0,script=/etc/qemu-ifup -device e1000,netdev=hostnet0,mac=00:10:1a:12:31:16,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4 -boot c -uuid d247b32c-0160-4000-ad78-437ee59281a0 -rtc-td-hack -no-kvm-pit-reinjection -name win2k8-32-blk-9-bugverification -drive file=/home/vrozenfe/work/images/test1.qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio1,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio1,id=virtio-blk-pci1 -drive file=/home/vrozenfe/work/images/test2.qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio2,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio2,id=virtio-blk-pci2 -drive file=/home/vrozenfe/work/images/test3.qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio3,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio3,id=virtio-blk-pci3 -drive file=/home/vrozenfe/work/images/test4.qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio4,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio4,id=virtio-blk-pci4 -monitor stdio

But still cannot reproduce the problem. 
Are you working with WLK 1.5 or 1.6?
Can you create a submission package and
sent it to me? I need to check all the details.
Best regards,
Vadim.

Comment 25 Qunfang Zhang 2011-04-07 06:12:29 UTC
Created attachment 490479 [details]
cpk file for win2k8-32-blk (msi=0)

Comment 26 Qunfang Zhang 2011-04-07 06:13:54 UTC
(In reply to comment #24)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > Hi Vadim,
> > 
> > I retest this job with fresh image and installing driver directly from vfd
> > file, and with default setting MSI=0,this job still fail with BSOD happened. 
> > 
> > CLI:
> > 
> > /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -m 6G -smp 4 -cpu cpu64-rhel6,+x2apic -usbdevice tablet
> > -drive
> > file=win2k8-32-sp2-bugverification.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio0,boot=on,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> > -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio0,id=virtio-blk-pci0 -netdev
> > tap,id=hostnet0,script=/etc/qemu-ifup -device
> > e1000,netdev=hostnet0,mac=00:10:1a:12:31:16,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4 -boot c -uuid
> > d247b32c-0160-4000-ad78-437ee59281a0 -rtc-td-hack -no-kvm-pit-reinjection
> > -chardev
> > socket,id=111a,path=/tmp/monitor-win2k8-32-sp2-bugverification-vfd,server,nowait
> > -mon chardev=111a,mode=readline -name win2k8-32-blk-9-bugverification-vfd -vnc
> > :1 -drive
> > file=disk1.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio1,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> > -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio1,id=virtio-blk-pci1 -drive
> > file=disk2.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio2,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> > -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio2,id=virtio-blk-pci2 -drive
> > file=disk3.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio3,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> > -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio3,id=virtio-blk-pci3 -drive
> > file=disk4.raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio4,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> > -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio4,id=virtio-blk-pci4
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Dawn
> 
> 
> Here's mine:
> 
> sudo
> /home/vrozenfe/work/troubles/qemu-kvm-rhel6/x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64
> -M rhel6.0.0 -m 1G -smp 2 -cpu qemu64,+x2apic -usbdevice tablet -drive
> file=/home/vrozenfe/work/images/w2k8-dtm-client.qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio0,boot=on,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio0,id=virtio-blk-pci0 -netdev
> tap,id=hostnet0,script=/etc/qemu-ifup -device
> e1000,netdev=hostnet0,mac=00:10:1a:12:31:16,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4 -boot c -uuid
> d247b32c-0160-4000-ad78-437ee59281a0 -rtc-td-hack -no-kvm-pit-reinjection -name
> win2k8-32-blk-9-bugverification -drive
> file=/home/vrozenfe/work/images/test1.qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio1,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio1,id=virtio-blk-pci1 -drive
> file=/home/vrozenfe/work/images/test2.qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio2,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio2,id=virtio-blk-pci2 -drive
> file=/home/vrozenfe/work/images/test3.qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio3,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio3,id=virtio-blk-pci3 -drive
> file=/home/vrozenfe/work/images/test4.qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio4,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop
> -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio4,id=virtio-blk-pci4 -monitor stdio
> 
> But still cannot reproduce the problem. 
> Are you working with WLK 1.5 or 1.6?

Hi, Vadim
We used WLK1.5. 

> Can you create a submission package and
> sent it to me? I need to check all the details.

Please refer to the attachment I upload in Comment 5.

> Best regards,
> Vadim.

Comment 32 Dor Laor 2011-05-04 15:00:19 UTC
Clearing the regression/blocker flags since we passed whql with msi=1

Comment 36 Vadim Rozenfeld 2011-09-12 08:18:29 UTC
Hi Dawn,

Could you please decrease amount of guest's memory to 2G and retest it on a freshly installed system with the latest (0.1-15) drivers. Next, increase the amount of the memory up to 6G and retest it again.
Please provide new memory dump and cpk files in case of crash(s).

Best regards,
Vadim.

Comment 37 dawu 2011-09-13 08:32:10 UTC
Hi Vadim, 

I'll have a try with latest drivers with 2G and 6G memory on a freshly system, and will update the results for you later.

Best Regards,
Dawn

Comment 38 dawu 2011-09-14 06:09:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #36)
> Hi Dawn,
> 
> Could you please decrease amount of guest's memory to 2G and retest it on a
> freshly installed system with the latest (0.1-15) drivers. Next, increase the
> amount of the memory up to 6G and retest it again.
> Please provide new memory dump and cpk files in case of crash(s).
> 
> Best regards,
> Vadim.

Hi Vadim,

This issue still reproduce on driver(0.1-15), but a good news is that it does not reproduce on the latest driver "0.1-16", job of "Sleep Stress With IO" passed without any BSOD and error with 2G and 6G memory.

Best Regards,
Dawn

Comment 39 Vadim Rozenfeld 2011-09-14 06:27:10 UTC
(In reply to comment #38)
> (In reply to comment #36)
> > Hi Dawn,
> > 
> > Could you please decrease amount of guest's memory to 2G and retest it on a
> > freshly installed system with the latest (0.1-15) drivers. Next, increase the
> > amount of the memory up to 6G and retest it again.
> > Please provide new memory dump and cpk files in case of crash(s).
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Vadim.
> 
> Hi Vadim,
> 
> This issue still reproduce on driver(0.1-15), but a good news is that it does
> not reproduce on the latest driver "0.1-16", job of "Sleep Stress With IO"
Hi Dawn,
It seems pretty weird. Nothing in viostor driver was changed between 0.1-15 and 0.1-16. Can we be sure that both drivers were tested in absolutely equal
environments?
 
Kind regards,
Vadim.

> passed without any BSOD and error with 2G and 6G memory.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Dawn

Comment 40 dawu 2011-09-14 06:51:23 UTC
Hi Vadim,

Yes, I am sure that this job was tested in the absolutely equal environments, the same host and the same guest, I only updated the driver from 0.1-15 to 0.1-16.

In additional, I remembered Ronen mentioned in mail that for new build 0.1-16, blk driver has a bug fix that was never tested for WHQL (in 1-15),so whatever this change is related with this bug or not, but the driver should be changed, right? any wrong, please correct me, thanks!

Best Regards,
Dawn

Comment 41 Vadim Rozenfeld 2011-09-14 07:48:47 UTC
(In reply to comment #40)
> Hi Vadim,
> 
> Yes, I am sure that this job was tested in the absolutely equal environments,
> the same host and the same guest, I only updated the driver from 0.1-15 to
> 0.1-16.
> 
> In additional, I remembered Ronen mentioned in mail that for new build 0.1-16,
> blk driver has a bug fix that was never tested for WHQL (in 1-15),so whatever
> this change is related with this bug or not, but the driver should be changed,
> right? any wrong, please correct me, thanks!
> 
Hi Dawn.

There were no viostor related changes between 0.1-15 and 0.1-16.
There only difference between 0.1-14 and 0.1-15 was in disabling serial number
support, which should affect XP and W2K3 guests only.
The most significant changes were between 0.1-12 and 0.1-13.

Anyway, I'm glad to know that the problem is not reproducible anymore with the latest driver.   

However, I would like to keep this bug open until the entire viostor WHQL process will be completed.

Best regards,
Vadim.

> Best Regards,
> Dawn

(In reply to comment #40)
> Hi Vadim,
> 
> Yes, I am sure that this job was tested in the absolutely equal environments,
> the same host and the same guest, I only updated the driver from 0.1-15 to
> 0.1-16.
> 
> In additional, I remembered Ronen mentioned in mail that for new build 0.1-16,
> blk driver has a bug fix that was never tested for WHQL (in 1-15),so whatever
> this change is related with this bug or not, but the driver should be changed,
> right? any wrong, please correct me, thanks!
> 
> Best Regards,
> Dawn

Comment 42 dawu 2011-09-14 07:55:57 UTC
(In reply to comment #41)
> (In reply to comment #40)
> > Hi Vadim,
> > 
> > Yes, I am sure that this job was tested in the absolutely equal environments,
> > the same host and the same guest, I only updated the driver from 0.1-15 to
> > 0.1-16.
> > 
> > In additional, I remembered Ronen mentioned in mail that for new build 0.1-16,
> > blk driver has a bug fix that was never tested for WHQL (in 1-15),so whatever
> > this change is related with this bug or not, but the driver should be changed,
> > right? any wrong, please correct me, thanks!
> > 
> Hi Dawn.
> 
> There were no viostor related changes between 0.1-15 and 0.1-16.
> There only difference between 0.1-14 and 0.1-15 was in disabling serial number
> support, which should affect XP and W2K3 guests only.
> The most significant changes were between 0.1-12 and 0.1-13.
> 
> Anyway, I'm glad to know that the problem is not reproducible anymore with the
> latest driver.   
> 
> However, I would like to keep this bug open until the entire viostor WHQL
> process will be completed.
> 
> Best regards,
> Vadim.
> 
Hi Vadim,

Thanks for your explanation,I agree with you for keeping this bug open until the entire viostor WHQL, and I will try more times to make sure this bug does not always reproduce.

Best Regards,
Dawn

> process will be completed.


> > Best Regards,
> > Dawn
> 
> (In reply to comment #40)
> > Hi Vadim,
> > 
> > Yes, I am sure that this job was tested in the absolutely equal environments,
> > the same host and the same guest, I only updated the driver from 0.1-15 to
> > 0.1-16.
> > 
> > In additional, I remembered Ronen mentioned in mail that for new build 0.1-16,
> > blk driver has a bug fix that was never tested for WHQL (in 1-15),so whatever
> > this change is related with this bug or not, but the driver should be changed,
> > right? any wrong, please correct me, thanks!
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Dawn

Comment 44 dawu 2011-10-13 03:05:31 UTC
According to comment 42, move this bug to verified.

Comment 45 Vadim Rozenfeld 2011-11-02 19:58:31 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Do not document

Comment 46 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 21:17:12 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1542.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.