Bug 693366 - cpuplugd: Fix incorrect multiplication in rules evaluation
Summary: cpuplugd: Fix incorrect multiplication in rules evaluation
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: s390utils
Version: 5.5
Hardware: s390x
OS: All
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Dan Horák
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 684940
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-04-04 12:51 UTC by IBM Bug Proxy
Modified: 2011-07-21 07:52 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: s390utils-1.8.1-13.el5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-21 07:52:24 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
s390-tools-rhel5-cpuplugd-multiplication.patch (641 bytes, text/plain)
2011-04-04 12:51 UTC, IBM Bug Proxy
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
IBM Linux Technology Center 71168 0 None None None Never
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1021 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE s390utils bug fix and enhancement update 2011-07-20 15:44:26 UTC

Description IBM Bug Proxy 2011-04-04 12:51:23 UTC
s390-tools-rhel5-cpuplugd-multiplication.patch

Description: cpuplugd: Fix incorrect multiplication in rules evaluation
Symptom:     Rules don't evaluate correctly when multiplication (*) is used.
Problem:     Missing return statement in switch/case block.
Solution:    Add return statement.

The patch has been tested, fixes the problem, and will be included in the next
upstream release of the s390-tools.

With best regards,
     Hendrik

Comment 1 IBM Bug Proxy 2011-04-04 12:51:27 UTC
Created attachment 489766 [details]
s390-tools-rhel5-cpuplugd-multiplication.patch

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2011-07-21 07:52:24 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1021.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.