Bug 696190 - [RFE] Provide eclipse-photran package
Summary: [RFE] Provide eclipse-photran package
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: distribution
Version: 5.6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: RHEL Program Management
QA Contact: Ondrej Hudlicky
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 696189
Blocks: 554476
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-04-13 14:08 UTC by J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Modified: 2013-07-03 04:13 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 696189
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-05 15:55:05 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) 2011-04-13 14:08:08 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #696189 +++

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

Include eclipse-photran fortran plugin http://www.eclipse.org/photran/

   3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

Needs to work on Fortran code in eclipse

   4. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional
requirements here)

eclipse-photran is available via RHN or EPEL

   5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat
and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully
implemented.

	yum install eclipse-photran

   6. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat bugzilla?

Couldn't find one

   7. How quickly does this need resolved? (desired target release)

5.8 if RHEL, asap if EPEL

   8. Does this request meet the RHEL Inclusion criteria (please review)

Yes

   9. List the affected packages

eclipse-photran

  10. Would the customer be able to assist in testing this functionality if implemented?

Yes

Comment 2 Andrew Overholt 2011-07-05 15:43:27 UTC
Due to complex dependency issues, we can't upgrade Eclipse in RHEL 5 to a recent enough version for this.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-05 15:55:05 UTC
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.