Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 696707 - nss_ldap client does not seem to get a response from ldap server
nss_ldap client does not seem to get a response from ldap server
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: nss_ldap (Show other bugs)
5.8
All Linux
high Severity high
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Nalin Dahyabhai
Ondrej Moriš
: OtherQA
Depends On:
Blocks: 758797
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-04-14 13:07 EDT by Heath Petty
Modified: 2014-07-24 23:36 EDT (History)
12 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: nss_ldap-253-46.el5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 574306
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-21 01:38:48 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
RHEL 4 patch applied to RHEL 5 nss_ldap (1.05 KB, patch)
2011-04-14 13:16 EDT, Heath Petty
no flags Details | Diff


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0268 normal SHIPPED_LIVE nss_ldap bug fix and enhancement update 2012-02-20 10:06:24 EST

  None (edit)
Comment 1 Heath Petty 2011-04-14 13:16:38 EDT
Created attachment 492173 [details]
RHEL 4 patch applied to RHEL 5 nss_ldap

This is not my patch, I just applied the patch for RHEL 4 to RHEL 5.
Comment 2 Heath Petty 2011-04-14 13:17:06 EDT
Customer has tested this patch and it solves their issue.

-Heath
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2012-02-21 01:38:48 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0268.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.