Bug 697191 - gdk-pixbuf2 compiled without png support
Summary: gdk-pixbuf2 compiled without png support
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gdk-pixbuf2
Version: 15
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthias Clasen
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-04-16 17:14 UTC by Fred
Modified: 2011-05-03 14:16 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-04-25 16:02:49 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fred 2011-04-16 17:14:09 UTC
Description of problem:
gdk-pixbuf2 has been compiled without png support

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gdk-pixbuf2-2.23.3-1.fc15.i686

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. type "gdk-pixbuf-csource --raw --build-list image.png" in the terminal
  
Actual results:
failed to load "image.png": Couldn't recognize the image file format for file 'image.png'


Expected results:
recognize the png file format


Additional info:
Trying to compile GIMP and it's stopping there because of this.

Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2011-04-25 16:02:49 UTC
Your problem may be real, but your analysis is wrong:

$ ldd /usr/lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.2300.3 | grep png
	libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libpng12.so.0 (0x00000039ddc00000)

Comment 2 Fred 2011-04-26 01:22:25 UTC
Hi! Analysis was provided by the kind people on the #gimp channel. What extra data would you need? 

Or are you just saying that gdk-pixbuf2 has png support. If so how can I test that?

Thanks a lot.

Comment 3 Matthias Clasen 2011-05-03 13:54:53 UTC
do what I did:

 ldd /usr/lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.2300.3 | grep png

that shows whether gdk-pixbuf is linked against libpng

then maybe

gvfs-info <your alleged png file>

to see what gvfs thinks its mime type is

Comment 4 Fred 2011-05-03 14:16:47 UTC
thanks for the help. I did that (I'm using 32bit) and got confirmation on #gnome-shell support was enabled. 

I'll continue exploring elsewhere then. Thank you very much.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.