Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
DescriptionSteven J. Levine
2011-04-18 14:12:21 UTC
This came up in a review of the 6.1 info, late in the cycle, so I'm filing it as a doc bug for 6.2 since it's pretty trivial all told but I would like to fix this in a future release -- but that involves a bit of setup to get the example output.
Looks good steve.
Not hugely important, but one thing that would have made the second entry (extend with cling) a bit clearer would be to also add "tags" to the -o argument. This way the devices and their tags would be displayed in the 'lvs' output.
brassow
On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Steven Levine wrote:
> > The 6.1 draft of the LVM manual contains a summary of new features for RHEL 6.1, section 1.1.2 here:
> >
> > http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Logical_Volume_Manager_Administration/LVM_overview.html#s1-ov-newfeatures-6.1-LVM
> >
> > Each of those bullet points includes a link to the section where the feature is documented.
> >
> > All of those updates are the small updates I have noted in previous email messages to this list, except for the new procedure for using the --alloc cling option of lvextend. This procedure comes from Corey's testing, and he has reviewed what's here:
> >
> > http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Logical_Volume_Manager_Administration/extend-lv-cling.html
> >
> > Please let me know by Monday April 18 if you have any concerns about this new information for 6.1. Thanks.
> >
> > -Steven
> >
This came up in a review of the 6.1 info, late in the cycle, so I'm filing it as a doc bug for 6.2 since it's pretty trivial all told but I would like to fix this in a future release -- but that involves a bit of setup to get the example output. Looks good steve. Not hugely important, but one thing that would have made the second entry (extend with cling) a bit clearer would be to also add "tags" to the -o argument. This way the devices and their tags would be displayed in the 'lvs' output. brassow On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Steven Levine wrote: > > The 6.1 draft of the LVM manual contains a summary of new features for RHEL 6.1, section 1.1.2 here: > > > > http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Logical_Volume_Manager_Administration/LVM_overview.html#s1-ov-newfeatures-6.1-LVM > > > > Each of those bullet points includes a link to the section where the feature is documented. > > > > All of those updates are the small updates I have noted in previous email messages to this list, except for the new procedure for using the --alloc cling option of lvextend. This procedure comes from Corey's testing, and he has reviewed what's here: > > > > http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Logical_Volume_Manager_Administration/extend-lv-cling.html > > > > Please let me know by Monday April 18 if you have any concerns about this new information for 6.1. Thanks. > > > > -Steven > >