Bug 698650 - IPv6 address display incorrectly in 'Status' UI and 'Network' UI.
Summary: IPv6 address display incorrectly in 'Status' UI and 'Network' UI.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-node
Version: 6.1
Hardware: All
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Joey Boggs
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-04-21 13:23 UTC by Ying Cui
Modified: 2011-12-06 19:07 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ovirt-node-2.0.2-0.1.git5dce5f9.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 19:07:13 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
ipv6_ifconfig.png (29.17 KB, image/png)
2011-04-21 13:23 UTC, Ying Cui 		no flags Details
ipv6_network.png (22.98 KB, image/png)
2011-04-21 13:24 UTC, Ying Cui 		no flags Details
ipv6_status.png (22.11 KB, image/png)
2011-04-21 13:25 UTC, Ying Cui 		no flags Details
ipv6_status (282.24 KB, image/png)
2011-07-17 03:47 UTC, Mohua Li 		no flags Details
ipv6_ifconfig (91.80 KB, image/png)
2011-07-17 03:48 UTC, Mohua Li 		no flags Details
ipv6_network (267.07 KB, image/png)
2011-07-17 03:48 UTC, Mohua Li 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1783 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE rhev-hypervisor6 bug fix and enhancement update 2011-12-06 15:10:54 UTC

Description Ying Cui 2011-04-21 13:23:25 UTC 
Description of problem:
IPv6 address display incorrectly in 'Status' page and 'Network' page.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhev-hypervisor-6.1-14.1

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RHEVH 6.1-14.1 successful.
2. setup the network with ipv6 address.
3. F2 to shell, ipv6 address get successful.
   # ifconfig breth0
   breth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:740:0B
          inet addr:192.168.6.166 Bcast:192.168.6.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::5054:ff:fe7400b/64 Scope:Link
          inet6 addr: 3ffe:607:ffff:10::c13f/64 Scope:Global
            ...
   Attachment:ipv6_ifconfig.png
4. check the ipv6 address in UI.


Actual results:
The ipv6 address fe80::5054:ff:fe7400b display in 'Status' and 'Network' page.
Attachment: ipv6_status.png
            ipv6_network.png
Expect Results:
   In status page and network page: the valid ipv6 address should be 3ffe:607:ffff:10::c13f.
Comment 1 Ying Cui 2011-04-21 13:23:58 UTC 
Created attachment 493828 [details]
ipv6_ifconfig.png
Comment 2 Ying Cui 2011-04-21 13:24:30 UTC 
Created attachment 493829 [details]
ipv6_network.png
Comment 3 Ying Cui 2011-04-21 13:25:02 UTC 
Created attachment 493830 [details]
ipv6_status.png
Comment 8 Mohua Li 2011-07-17 03:46:37 UTC 
rhev-hypervisor 6.2-0.5, there is sth i not quite understand, i could see 2 ipv6 address in previous setup for rhevm, 

but now i met only one invalid "link" address for rhevm bridge, and no address display for rhevm in network page(read-only), see attachment, i need to assgin this bug,
Comment 9 Mohua Li 2011-07-17 03:47:57 UTC 
Created attachment 513507 [details]
ipv6_status
Comment 10 Mohua Li 2011-07-17 03:48:24 UTC 
Created attachment 513508 [details]
ipv6_ifconfig
Comment 11 Mohua Li 2011-07-17 03:48:51 UTC 
Created attachment 513509 [details]
ipv6_network
Comment 13 Alan Pevec 2011-08-03 10:56:59 UTC 
Patch review:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/ovirt-devel/2011-August/msg00007.html
Comment 16 cshao 2011-08-30 03:12:40 UTC 
Test version:
rhev-hypervisor-6.2-0.14.el6

There is no IPv6 address shows in 'Status' page and 'Network' page.

So change bug status to VERIFIED.
Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 19:07:13 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1783.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.