Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/varekova/aspell-pt_BR.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/varekova/aspell-pt_BR-20090702-1.fc13.src.rpm The upstream of Portuguese dictionary split the dictionary to two parts this bug is for the European Portuguese part.
rpmlint output: aspell-pt_BR.src:27: W: configure-without-libdir-spec It has custom ./configure script, not autoconf. aspell-pt_BR.x86_64: E: no-binary aspell-pt_BR.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Both are caused by aspell design, it's data files are architecture dependent and these reports seem to be common to all aspell language packages. All MUST/SHOULD package review items are ok, .spec file looks sane (apart from Epoch:50, which is another aspell oddity). I approve the package.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: aspell-pt_BR Short Description: Brazilian Portuguese dictionaries for Aspell Owners: varekova Branches: InitialCC:
Next time, please fix your Review Summary. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_Your_Review_Request You also made a SCM Request with no branches.
Git done (by process-git-requests).
You can also remove BuildRoot tag [1] and %clean section [2]. [1] - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag [2] - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean Looking at spec: Obsoletes: aspell-pt <= 50:0.50 Provides: aspell-pt = %{epoch}:%{version} is it right? since it's a pt-br package.
Thanks, BuildRoot tag and the clean part.