Hide Forgot
Description of problem: How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: (get a fresh RHEL-6.0 machine where libhbalinux is not installed) # yum install libhbalinux-1.0.10-1.el6 # rpm -qa | grep -e fcoe -e hba | sort fcoe-utils-1.0.18-1.el6.i686 libhbaapi-2.2-10.el6.i686 libhbalinux-1.0.10-1.el6.i686 # fcoeadm -i No FCoE interfaces created. # yum install libhbalinux-1.0.10-2.el6 # rpm -qa | grep -e fcoe -e hba | sort fcoe-utils-1.0.18-1.el6.i686 libhbaapi-2.2-10.el6.i686 libhbalinux-1.0.10-2.el6.i686 # fcoeadm -i fcoeadm: libHBAAPI or libhbalinux error Try 'fcoeadm --help' for more information. # echo $? 14 Actual results: "fcoeadm -i" print an error message Expected results: "fcoeadm -i" works as expected
fcoe-utils cease to work properly after libhbalinux is updated due to poorly written libhbalinux %postun section. See Bug 690014 for details. Consider 6.1 blocker, please.
Thanks for the quick response. Available in CVS as libhbalinux-1.0.10-3.el6
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: After upgrading the libhbalinux package, the "fcoeadm -i" command (which shows information about FCoE instances) printed an error message. With this update, the "fcoeadm -i" command has been fixed, and no longer returns an error message.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0799.html