Bug 70232 - RELEASE_NOTES Kernel Notes HZ=XXX inconcistency
RELEASE_NOTES Kernel Notes HZ=XXX inconcistency
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: distribution (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: John Ha
Jay Turner
Depends On:
Blocks: 67217
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2002-07-31 02:15 EDT by Thomas M Steenholdt
Modified: 2015-01-07 18:58 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2002-08-02 01:22:20 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Thomas M Steenholdt 2002-07-31 02:15:41 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020724

Description of problem:
In the RELEASE_NOTES of RH Limbo 7.3.93 there is a small inconcistency under
Kernel notes, where the "introduction" tels that HZ=512 is now default on all
i686, Athlon, etc... The first bullet tells that the default is HZ=1000...

Small thing, but worthy of a quick fixup ;-)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. gedit /mnt/cdrom/RELEASE_NOTES
2. scroll to Kernel notes and read

Actual Results:  Inconcistency in HZ= definition

Expected Results:  Concistency!

Additional info:
Comment 1 John Ha 2002-08-02 11:10:28 EDT
The correct value should be hz=1000. The hz=512 has been edited to the correct
value. Thank you for bringing this error to our attention. The corrected version
will appear by the next release.

Thanks again!
Comment 2 Forrest 2002-08-02 17:06:21 EDT
If you are changing it back to 1000, you need to also change part that says that
the system clock ticks 5 times as fast.  It should be 10 times as fast.  Beta1
had 1000, and it looks like Beta2 has 512.  What is it going to be for the final
Comment 3 John Ha 2002-08-07 15:49:13 EDT
It seems I was mistaken. After conferring with our kernel
engineering team on this issue, it has been determined 
that the final value will be HZ=512.

I apologize for the confusion and any inconvenience it may
have caused.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.