Bug 704538 - abrt should not include multilib libraries
Summary: abrt should not include multilib libraries
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: abrt
Version: 6.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jiri Moskovcak
QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-05-13 14:18 UTC by Siddharth Nagar
Modified: 2015-02-01 22:53 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-08-03 14:23:06 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Siddharth Nagar 2011-05-13 14:18:27 UTC 
Description of problem:
abrt on x86_64 should not install abrt-lib.i686 and other 32-bit libraries.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
abrt-1.1.16-3.el6.x86_64

How reproducible: 
Always



Steps to Reproduce:
$ rpm -qlp abrt-libs-1.1.16-3.el6.i686.rpm
/usr/lib/libABRTUtils.so.0
/usr/lib/libABRTUtils.so.0.0.1
/usr/lib/libABRTdUtils.so.0
/usr/lib/libABRTdUtils.so.0.0.1
/usr/lib/libbtparser.so.1
/usr/lib/libbtparser.so.1.0.1

We pull in packages as multilib when they contain files matching /usr/lib/*.so.*

  
Actual results:


Expected results:
We should not be installing the i686 rpm.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Jiri Moskovcak 2011-05-31 13:15:31 UTC 
The example above looks fine to me

/usr/lib/*.so.* should match the i686 package

/usr/lib64/*.so.* is probably what you're looking for

Maybe I just don't understand it, can you please be more specific about what you're trying to achieve?
Comment 2 Radek Vokál 2011-06-10 08:16:43 UTC 
Sidharth, can you provide more info. Is 64 abrt-core package pulling in 32bit abrt-libs? I haven't reproduce that on my box.
Comment 3 Jiri Moskovcak 2011-08-03 14:23:06 UTC 
ABRT2 is now in rhel6 repos and this bug shouldn't be there (at least I can't reproduce it) so I'm closing this, feel free to re-open it, if you have some new information.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.