Bug 705172 - 389-ds should only be supported and supplied in channels for i386 and x86_64 Server distributions - RHEL 6.1 0day Advisory
Summary: 389-ds should only be supported and supplied in channels for i386 and x86_64 ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: 389-ds-base
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Rich Megginson
QA Contact: Chandrasekar Kannan
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 705837 752267
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-05-16 20:39 UTC by Jenny Severance
Modified: 2015-01-04 23:48 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-4.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 752267 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 17:48:42 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2011:1711 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE 389-ds-base bug fix and enhancement update 2011-12-06 01:02:20 UTC

Description Jenny Severance 2011-05-16 20:39:56 UTC
Description of problem:
389 is only going to be support on i386 and x86_64 architectures and Server
distributions.  The spec file for the errata needs to fixed to support only
supplying the packages via these packages.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 5 Amita Sharma 2011-09-21 17:08:12 UTC
 Checked on http://download.devel.redhat.com/brewroot/packages/389-ds-base/1.2.9.11/1.el6/, hence VERIFIED.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 17:48:42 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1711.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.