Hide Forgot
Description of problem: I keep getting this error when MRTG runs: Constant subroutine SNMP_Session::AF_INET6 redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Exporte r.pm line 67. at /usr/bin/../lib64/mrtg2/SNMP_Session.pm line 149 Prototype mismatch: sub SNMP_Session::AF_INET6 () vs none at /usr/share/perl5/Ex porter.pm line 67. at /usr/bin/../lib64/mrtg2/SNMP_Session.pm line 149 Constant subroutine SNMP_Session::PF_INET6 redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Exporte r.pm line 67. at /usr/bin/../lib64/mrtg2/SNMP_Session.pm line 149 Prototype mismatch: sub SNMP_Session::PF_INET6 () vs none at /usr/share/perl5/Ex porter.pm line 67. at /usr/bin/../lib64/mrtg2/SNMP_Session.pm line 149 Constant subroutine SNMPv1_Session::AF_INET6 redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Expor ter.pm line 67. at /usr/bin/../lib64/mrtg2/SNMP_Session.pm line 604 Prototype mismatch: sub SNMPv1_Session::AF_INET6 () vs none at /usr/share/perl5/ Exporter.pm line 67. at /usr/bin/../lib64/mrtg2/SNMP_Session.pm line 604 Constant subroutine SNMPv1_Session::PF_INET6 redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Expor ter.pm line 67. at /usr/bin/../lib64/mrtg2/SNMP_Session.pm line 604 Prototype mismatch: sub SNMPv1_Session::PF_INET6 () vs none at /usr/share/perl5/ Exporter.pm line 67. at /usr/bin/../lib64/mrtg2/SNMP_Session.pm line 604 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mrtg-2.16.2-5.el6.x86_64 perl-IO-Socket-INET6-2.56-4.el6.noarch How reproducible: Everytime. Steps to Reproduce: 1. LANG=C LC_ALL=C /usr/bin/mrtg /etc/mrtg/mrtg.cfg -- lock-file /var/lock/mrtg/mrtg_l --confcache-file /var/lib/mrtg/mrtg.ok 2. 3. Actual results: Error listed above. Expected results: No Error. Additional info:
Created attachment 500397 [details] proposed patch This patch should resolve the issue.
The provided patch has revolved the issue. Thank you!
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1449.html