Hide Forgot
Created attachment 501035 [details] Invalid NFS format Description of problem: No format limit when input irregular Kdump NFS location. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rhev-hypervisor-6.1-201105010 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Set KDump NFS Location with irregular ip, e.g. 10.66.65.10000:/h. 2. Select Apply button. Actual results: No format limit when input irregular Kdump NFS location. Expected results: "Invalid NFS format" should pop-up when input irregular Kdump NFS location. In additional:
Change Version-Release to rhev-hypervisor-6.1-20110510.1
ack, just that validation errors should be messages on the form, not popups (there's separate UX feedback bz for that)
Test version: rhev-hypervisor-6.2-0.15.el6 FALSE http://redhat.com test.test.com testnfs.test.com: 192.168.100.1 192.168.100.1: TRUE test.test.com:/ testnfs.test.com:/test testnfs.test.com:/test/dir 192.168.100.1:/ 192.168.100.1:/test 192.168.100.1:/test/dir So change bug status to VERIFIED.
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: Previously, when you input an invalid NFS format into the Kdump NFS location field, Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor would not inform you of this. "Invalid NFS Format" now pops up when you input an irregular Kdump NFS location.
Deleted Technical Notes Contents. Old Contents: Previously, when you input an invalid NFS format into the Kdump NFS location field, Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor would not inform you of this. "Invalid NFS Format" now pops up when you input an irregular Kdump NFS location.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1783.html