Bug 710348 - GhostPDL in its entirety
Summary: GhostPDL in its entirety
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ghostscript
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Kaspar // Dee'Kej
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-06-03 06:35 UTC by Trever Adams
Modified: 2018-09-06 15:21 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-09-06 15:21:20 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Trever Adams 2011-06-03 06:35:53 UTC
I have requested this before, but it was turned down. I ask again. Is it possible to get GhostPCL (at least) and the others (XPS, PDF, etc.) packaged in fedora? It would be a huge help to me.

Thank you.

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2011-06-03 09:06:18 UTC
Last time I tried this it had several bundled versions of system libraries (which are not permitted in Fedora), and I couldn't get it to build when trying to get it to use the system libraries.

The situation may have improved by now, but I'm unlikely to have the time to look at it myself in the near future.  Perhaps you could have a go at packaging it?

Comment 2 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2015-04-22 11:00:35 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 3 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2015-08-03 11:59:30 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 4 David Kaspar // Dee'Kej 2018-09-06 15:21:20 UTC
In case the GhostPDL is needed by someone in Fedora, they would have to package it and get into Fedora by themselves. This cannot be part of the Ghostscript package, and I don't have capacity to maintain another package.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.