Bug 710699 - Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Unique - Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"
Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Unique - Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Emmanuel Seyman
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 623617
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-06-04 06:03 UTC by Liang Suilong
Modified: 2011-07-01 18:56 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc15
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-01 18:54:06 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
emmanuel: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Liang Suilong 2011-06-04 06:03:52 UTC
SPEC: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk2-Unique.spec
SRPM: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-1.fc15.src.rpm

Description:
Perl bindings for the C library "libunique" that provides a mechanism for
writing single instance applications. If you launch a single instance
application twice, the second instance will either just quit or will send a
message to the running instance.

Koji Result:
F-15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3110959
Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3110984

Koji builds are successful. Rpmlint is silent too.

The latest shutter is depending on perl-Gtk2-Unique, so the request is quite urgent.

Comment 1 Emmanuel Seyman 2011-06-04 21:01:44 UTC
Taking.

Comment 2 Emmanuel Seyman 2011-06-04 21:57:42 UTC
=== KEY ===

 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===

 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
     Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3111488

 [x] Rpmlint output:

perl-Gtk2-Unique.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libunique -> lib unique, lib-unique, uniqueness
perl-Gtk2-Unique.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libunique -> lib unique, lib-unique, uniqueness
perl-Gtk2-Unique.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libunique -> lib unique, lib-unique, uniqueness
perl-Gtk2-Unique.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libunique -> lib unique, lib-unique, uniqueness
perl-Gtk2-Unique.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Gtk2/Unique/Unique.so Unique.so()(64bit)
perl-Gtk2-Unique.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Gtk2/Unique/Unique.so Unique.so()(64bit)
perl-Gtk2-Unique.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Gtk2/Unique/Install/unique-autogen.h
perl-Gtk2-Unique.x86_64: W: manifest-in-perl-module /usr/share/doc/perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05/MANIFEST
perl-Gtk2-Unique.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Gtk2/Unique/Install/unique-perl.h
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.

Silent, this is not.
The spelling mistakes are a false positive. Let's forget about them.
The private-shared-object-provides warnings will go away if you just add
%{?perl_default_filter} above the %description stanza. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl_default_filter for more details.
The MANIFEST should be removed.
The include files should probably be put in a -devel subpackage unless there's
a compelling reason not to.

 [x] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Buildroot is correct
Yup. Note that this is no longer needed.

 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.

WTF ?!
The package is licensed "GPL+ or Artistic" but the License field of the spec
says "LGPLv2+". Where did this come from ?

 [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
0beb552933b765a017588563a71af123  Gtk2-Unique-0.05.tar.gz

 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly.
Note that defattr is no longer needed.

 [x] Package consistently uses macros.
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [!] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===

 [x] Latest version is packaged.
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
     Tested on: rawxhide.x86_64
 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
     Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3111488
 [?] Package functions as described.
 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
 [-] File based requires are sane.
 [-] %check is present and the tests pass
Cannot be done since tests require DISPLAY

Please fix the errors I've pointed out.

Comment 3 Emmanuel Seyman 2011-06-18 10:23:18 UTC
Is this still urgent?

Comment 4 Liang Suilong 2011-06-18 21:05:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Is this still urgent?

I am so sorry that I was busy working and organizing Lovelock Event @ Canton. So I forgot to update the review request. Now all the thing had been done.

SPEC: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk2-Unique.spec
SRPM: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc15.src.rpm

koji Result: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3141050

Review is urgent because shutter is still waiting this package.

Comment 5 Emmanuel Seyman 2011-06-18 23:12:55 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> 
>  [x] Rpmlint output:

perl-Gtk2-Unique.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libunique -> lib unique, lib-unique, uniqueness
perl-Gtk2-Unique.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libunique -> lib unique, lib-unique, uniqueness
perl-Gtk2-Unique.src: E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-06-19
perl-Gtk2-Unique.src:31: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 31, tab: line 1)
perl-Gtk2-Unique.spec:31: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 31, tab: line 1)
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.

As said before, the spelling mistakes are flase positives, rpmlint treats changelog entries as being done at noon so the changelog-time-in-future is a flase positive as well. Please use either tabs or spaces in your spec file (I prefer spaces but the choice is up to you).

> The package is licensed "GPL+ or Artistic" but the License field of the spec
> says "LGPLv2+". Where did this come from ?

Spec file now says "GPL+ or Artistic"

APPROVED.

Comment 6 Liang Suilong 2011-06-19 06:11:11 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > 
> >  [x] Rpmlint output:
> 
> perl-Gtk2-Unique.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libunique -> lib unique,
> lib-unique, uniqueness
> perl-Gtk2-Unique.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libunique -> lib
> unique, lib-unique, uniqueness
> perl-Gtk2-Unique.src: E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-06-19
> perl-Gtk2-Unique.src:31: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 31, tab:
> line 1)
> perl-Gtk2-Unique.spec:31: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 31,
> tab: line 1)
> 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.
> 
> As said before, the spelling mistakes are flase positives, rpmlint treats
> changelog entries as being done at noon so the changelog-time-in-future is a
> flase positive as well. Please use either tabs or spaces in your spec file (I
> prefer spaces but the choice is up to you).
> 
> > The package is licensed "GPL+ or Artistic" but the License field of the spec
> > says "LGPLv2+". Where did this come from ?
> 
> Spec file now says "GPL+ or Artistic"
> 
> APPROVED.

Thank you very much! I request to push the package to Fedora git repository.

Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2011-06-19 22:20:28 UTC
No scm request present, please see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests

Comment 8 Liang Suilong 2011-06-20 10:16:05 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: perl-Gtk2-Unique
Short Description: Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"
Owners: liangsuilong
Branches: f14 f15 el6

Comment 9 Emmanuel Seyman 2011-06-20 11:30:29 UTC
please add perl-sig as InitialCC:
All perl modules should do this.

Comment 10 Liang Suilong 2011-06-20 11:34:48 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: perl-Gtk2-Unique
Short Description: Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"
Owners: liangsuilong
Branches: f14 f15 el6
InitialCC: perl-sig

Comment 11 Gwyn Ciesla 2011-06-20 11:59:11 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2011-06-22 08:21:20 UTC
perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc15

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2011-06-22 08:21:29 UTC
perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc14

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2011-06-24 03:26:53 UTC
perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2011-07-01 18:54:01 UTC
perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2011-07-01 18:56:31 UTC
perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.