Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 712126

Summary: corosync coroipcc doesn't handle case when recvmsg can return 0
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Jan Friesse <jfriesse>
Component: corosyncAssignee: Jan Friesse <jfriesse>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Cluster QE <mspqa-list>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.1CC: cluster-maint, djansa, jkortus, sdake
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 6.2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: corosync-1.4.0-1.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Do not document.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 11:51:07 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Proposed patch sent to ML none

Description Jan Friesse 2011-06-09 14:43:42 UTC
Description of problem:
According specification recvmsg can return 0, which means that
connection is closed. We had this check, but limited only for systems
other then Linux. recvmsg can return 0 even on Linux, so check is now
applied on all systems.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Corosync master

How reproducible:
Without change in code it's almost impossible

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run corosync restart in cycle + IPC client connection is cycle
2. After few hundred  years on solar and eclipse IPC will starts eating a lot of CPU and will cycle in recvmsg . Client never exits and loops forever
  
Actual results:
Sometime IPC never exists

Expected results:
IPC exits

Additional info:
Best way to reproduce is to use code change in corosync (sleep before recvmsg, kill corosync)

Comment 1 Jan Friesse 2011-06-09 14:44:09 UTC
Created attachment 503915 [details]
Proposed patch sent to ML

Comment 3 Jan Friesse 2011-06-13 13:14:54 UTC
Patch commited in GIT master as 2e5dc5f322a5a852d31f5775debbf51e062695ba

Comment 7 Steven Dake 2011-10-27 18:53:40 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Do not document.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 11:51:07 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1515.html