Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 712794

Summary: bacula-common should depend on shadow-utils
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Jan Stodola <jstodola>
Component: baculaAssignee: Jan Görig <jgorig>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.1CC: azelinka, mbanas, ovasik, pkovar
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: EasyFix
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: bacula-5.0.0-9.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Prior to this update, the shadow-utils package was not listed among the package dependencies for Bacula. As a result, the bacula user and bacula group were not created when the shadow-utils package was not present on the system, and a warning message was displayed during the bacula packages installation. This bug has been fixed by adding shadow-utils to the package dependencies.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-08-31 09:16:15 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jan Stodola 2011-06-13 07:40:26 UTC
Description of problem:
bacula-common runs '/usr/sbin/groupadd' and '/usr/sbin/useradd' in its installation scriplets, but the package doesn't depend on shadow-utils:

[root@rtt5 rpms]# rpm --nogpg -q --scripts -p bacula-common-5.0.0-7.el6.s390x.rpm 
preinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
/usr/sbin/groupadd -g 133 -r bacula &>/dev/null || :
/usr/sbin/useradd  -u 133 -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/bacula -M \
        -c 'Bacula Backup System' -g bacula bacula &>/dev/null || :
postuninstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
#Dropped due to Guidelines
#test "$1" != 0 || /usr/sbin/userdel  bacula &>/dev/null || :
#test "$1" != 0 || /usr/sbin/groupdel bacula &>/dev/null || :
[root@rtt5 rpms]# rpm -qf /usr/sbin/groupadd
shadow-utils-4.1.4.2-9.el6.s390x
[root@rtt5 rpms]# rpm --nogpg -q --requires -p bacula-common-5.0.0-7.el6.s390x.rpm | grep shadow-utils
[root@rtt5 rpms]#

It causes warning messages in some cases:
...
  Installing : ca-certificates-2010.63-3.el6.noarch                       36/38 
  Installing : openssl-1.0.0-10.el6.s390x                                 37/38 
  Installing : bacula-common-5.0.0-7.el6.s390x                            38/38 
warning: user bacula does not exist - using root
warning: group bacula does not exist - using root
warning: user bacula does not exist - using root
warning: group bacula does not exist - using root


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bacula-common-5.0.0-7.el6

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum --installroot=/root/new_install_root install bacula-common

Actual results:
warning messages during installation

Expected results:
bacula-common depends on shadow-utils, no warning messages during installation

Comment 4 Jan Görig 2011-06-23 08:37:43 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Cause
- shadow-utils wasn't listed in package dependencies
Consequence
- bacula user and group hasn't been created when shadow-utils package wasn't installed
Fix
- added shadow-utils to dependencies
Result
- user and group are created, no warning message on installation

Comment 6 Petr Kovar 2011-06-23 15:50:38 UTC
    Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    Diffed Contents:
@@ -1,8 +1 @@
-Cause
+Prior to this update, the shadow-utils package was not listed among the package dependencies for Bacula. As a result, the bacula user and bacula group were not created when the shadow-utils package was not present on the system, and a warning message was displayed during the bacula packages installation. This bug has been fixed by adding shadow-utils to the package dependencies.-- shadow-utils wasn't listed in package dependencies
-Consequence
-- bacula user and group hasn't been created when shadow-utils package wasn't installed
-Fix
-- added shadow-utils to dependencies
-Result
-- user and group are created, no warning message on installation

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2011-08-31 09:16:15 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1232.html