Bug 713185 - [vdsm] getStorageDomainsList displays the same domain twice.
Summary: [vdsm] getStorageDomainsList displays the same domain twice.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: vdsm
Version: 6.1
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Igor Lvovsky
QA Contact: yeylon@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-06-14 15:32 UTC by David Naori
Modified: 2016-04-18 06:40 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: vdsm-4.9-79
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 07:21:09 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2011:1782 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE new packages: vdsm 2011-12-06 11:55:51 UTC

Description David Naori 2011-06-14 15:32:28 UTC
Description of problem: getStorageDomainsList displays the same domain (blockSD) twice:

[root@camel-vdsa images]# vdsClient -s 0 getStorageDomainsList
a1dc6df5-97f7-44e0-a267-b22d3987d3eb
a1dc6df5-97f7-44e0-a267-b22d3987d3eb
47172803-d3ee-421b-9f47-764d2580bd4e

the problem is fileSD scanDomains returns blockSD aswell. 

def scanDomains(pattern="*"):
    log = logging.getLogger("scanDomains")

    finalPat = os.path.join(sd.StorageDomain.storage_repository,
                            sd.DOMAIN_MNT_POINT, pattern)
    mntList = glob.glob(finalPat)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
vdsm-4.9-75

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.add blockSD

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Igor Lvovsky 2011-06-16 06:46:47 UTC
http://gerrit.usersys.redhat.com/#change,593

Comment 7 David Naori 2011-07-07 13:14:23 UTC
Verified
vdsm-4.9-80.el6.x86_64

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 07:21:09 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1782.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.