Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Test-ConsistentVersion/perl-Test-ConsistentVersion.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Test-ConsistentVersion/perl-Test-ConsistentVersion-0.2.3-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: The purpose of this module is to make it easy for other distribution authors to have consistent version numbers within the modules (as well as readme file and changelog) of the distribution.
Taking.
[x] package passes [-] not applicable [!] package fails == MUST == [x] rpmlint output $ rpmlint perl-Test-ConsistentVersion-0.2.3-1.fc14.src.rpm perl-Test-ConsistentVersion.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) versioning -> version, versifying, versification perl-Test-ConsistentVersion.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US readme -> reamed, remade, read me perl-Test-ConsistentVersion.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US changelog -> change log, change-log, changeling mock -r fedora-r1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpmlint perl-Test-ConsistentVersion.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint perl-Test-ConsistentVersion-0.2.3-1.fc16.noarch.rpm perl-Test-ConsistentVersion.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) versioning -> version, versifying, versification perl-Test-ConsistentVersion.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US readme -> reamed, remade, read me perl-Test-ConsistentVersion.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US changelog -> change log, change-log, changeling 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. => Those warnings can be safely ignored [x] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [x] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [x] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license [x] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. => GPL+ or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file must be included in %doc [x] The spec file must be written in American English [x] The spec file for the package MUST be legible [x] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL $ sha1sum Test-ConsistentVersion-v0.2.3.tar.gz 7b317131f5fbbecdd32d92ba6c7885fe0d58cbd2 Test-ConsistentVersion-v0.2.3.tar.gz [x] The package '''MUST''' successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3180123 [-] The spec file MUST handle locales properly [-] Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun [x] Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries [-] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [x] A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [x] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings [x] Permissions on files must be set properly [x] Each package must consistently use macros [x] The package must contain code, or permissable content [-] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage [-] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application [-] Header files must be in a -devel package [-] Static libraries must be in a -static package [-] If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package [-] Subpackages requiring the base package [-] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built [-] Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section [x] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages [x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 == SHOULD == [-] If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane [-] Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg [-] If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself [x] %check is present and the tests pass [?] Package functions as described. == Notes == I guess the man page could be marked as %doc, but I won't block the package for that. APPROVED
Thanks, Mathieu. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-ConsistentVersion Short Description: Ensures a CPAN distribution has consistent versioning Owners: eseyman Branches: f15 InitialCC: perl-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests).
perl-Test-ConsistentVersion-0.2.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-ConsistentVersion-0.2.3-1.fc15
perl-Test-ConsistentVersion-0.2.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository.
perl-Test-ConsistentVersion-0.2.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.