Hide Forgot
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #704567 +++ Description of problem: Static analysis of the code with/without applied patches discovered some possible problems in the code. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): portreserve-0.0.4-8.fc15 --- Additional comment from jpopelka on 2011-05-13 11:46:22 EDT --- Created attachment 498794 [details] small memory leak Error: RESOURCE_LEAK: portreserve-0.0.4/src/portreserve.c:244: alloc_fn: Calling allocation function "malloc". portreserve-0.0.4/src/portreserve.c:244: var_assign: Assigning: "cfgfile" = storage returned from "malloc(strlen(dir) + 255UL + 1UL)". portreserve-0.0.4/src/portreserve.c:245: var_assign: Assigning: "cfgf" = "cfgfile". portreserve-0.0.4/src/portreserve.c:251: noescape: Variable "cfgfile" is not freed or pointed-to in function "strcpy". portreserve-0.0.4/src/portreserve.c:254: leaked_storage: Variable "cfgf" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to. portreserve-0.0.4/src/portreserve.c:254: leaked_storage: Variable "cfgfile" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to. portreserve-0.0.4/src/portreserve.c:260: noescape: Variable "cfgf" is not freed or pointed-to in function "strcpy". portreserve-0.0.4/src/portreserve.c:261: noescape: Variable "cfgfile" is not freed or pointed-to in function "reserve". portreserve-0.0.4/src/portreserve.c:120:22: noescape: "reserve" does not free or save its pointer parameter "file". portreserve-0.0.4/src/portreserve.c:314: leaked_storage: Variable "cfgf" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to. portreserve-0.0.4/src/portreserve.c:314: leaked_storage: Variable "cfgfile" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to. --- Additional comment from twaugh on 2011-05-20 11:00:27 EDT --- Thanks, applied upstream.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an exception in the current release, please ask your support representative.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0447.html