Bug 718782 - [abrt] kernel: WARNING: at mm/page-writeback.c:1169 __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x82/0xe7(): TAINTED ---------W
Summary: [abrt] kernel: WARNING: at mm/page-writeback.c:1169 __set_page_dirty_nobuffer...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: 15
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:bdffecd7e6cfd9fb3b0e090674e...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-07-04 15:29 UTC by John Kissane
Modified: 2011-12-06 19:05 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 19:05:43 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description John Kissane 2011-07-04 15:29:13 UTC
abrt version: 2.0.3
architecture:   x86_64
cmdline:        ro root=UUID=bfd2d5c4-5b78-4cf9-9c17-211f0a27afe8 rd_NO_LUKS rd_NO_LVM rd_NO_MD rd_NO_DM LANG=en_IE SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 KEYTABLE=uk rhgb quiet
component:      kernel
kernel:         2.6.38.8-32.fc15.x86_64
kernel_tainted: 512
kernel_tainted_long: Taint on warning.
os_release:     Fedora release 15 (Lovelock)
package:        kernel
reason:         WARNING: at mm/page-writeback.c:1169 __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x82/0xe7()
time:           Mon Jul  4 16:28:23 2011

backtrace:
:WARNING: at mm/page-writeback.c:1169 __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x82/0xe7()
:Hardware name: OptiPlex 760                 
:Modules linked in: tcp_lp fuse nfs lockd fscache nfs_acl auth_rpcgss ip6table_filter ip6_tables ebtable_nat ebtables vmnet ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat vmblock nf_nat vsock xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle vmci bridge vmmon sunrpc fcoe libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc scsi_tgt 8021q garp stp llc cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf snd_hda_codec_analog ppdev dell_wmi sparse_keymap snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep dcdbas parport_pc parport microcode snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm snd_timer i2c_i801 serio_raw 3c59x snd mii iTCO_wdt e1000e iTCO_vendor_support soundcore snd_page_alloc wmi virtio_net ipv6 pata_acpi ata_generic usb_storage uas i915 drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core video [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
:Pid: 24013, comm: vmware-vmx Not tainted 2.6.38.8-32.fc15.x86_64 #1
:Call Trace:
: [<ffffffff8105511a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b
: [<ffffffff8105514c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
: [<ffffffff810dfc6a>] __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x82/0xe7
: [<ffffffff8111516d>] migrate_page_copy+0x122/0x1af
: [<ffffffff81115231>] migrate_page+0x37/0x42
: [<ffffffffa03bdaaf>] nfs_migrate_page+0x50/0xb3 [nfs]
: [<ffffffff811152d5>] move_to_new_page+0x99/0x1a1
: [<ffffffff81115732>] migrate_pages+0x246/0x38c
: [<ffffffff8110b787>] ? compaction_alloc+0x0/0x2a3
: [<ffffffff8110bf73>] compact_zone+0x3e7/0x5ca
: [<ffffffff8110c2e5>] compact_zone_order+0x94/0x9f
: [<ffffffff8110c381>] try_to_compact_pages+0x91/0xe3
: [<ffffffff8146e867>] __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0xa7/0x16d
: [<ffffffffa02ec4e8>] ? HostIF_ReadUptime+0x16/0x18 [vmmon]
: [<ffffffffa02f0459>] ? Task_Switch+0x316/0xc09 [vmmon]
: [<ffffffff810deea3>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x46a/0x77f
: [<ffffffff8110a321>] alloc_pages_vma+0xf5/0xfa
: [<ffffffff81118e6c>] do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0xbf/0x261
: [<ffffffff810f13cf>] ? pmd_offset+0x19/0x3f
: [<ffffffff810f4750>] handle_mm_fault+0x113/0x1ce
: [<ffffffff81478f30>] do_page_fault+0x358/0x37a
: [<ffffffffa02eacbe>] ? LinuxDriver_UnlockedIoctl+0x18/0x1c [vmmon]
: [<ffffffff8112f3a0>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x47e/0x4bf
: [<ffffffff81120f31>] ? fsnotify_modify+0x5f/0x67
: [<ffffffff81129e21>] ? path_put+0x1f/0x23
: [<ffffffff814761d5>] page_fault+0x25/0x30

comment:
:No idea!
:.

Comment 1 John Kissane 2011-09-14 12:12:04 UTC
Package: kernel
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 15 (Lovelock)

Comment
-----
Not sure what caused it.

Comment 2 Stephane Gauthier 2011-11-03 15:11:02 UTC
Getting the same on a RHEL6.1 x86_64 KVM guest... Any updates?

THanks,

Comment 3 Andrew Case 2011-11-03 19:27:11 UTC
+1 for RHEL6.1 x86_64

Comment 4 Josh Boyer 2011-11-03 19:32:05 UTC
For those of you seeing this with RHEL 6.x, you should really file a bug against the RHEL product family.

John, the 2.6.38 kernel is fairly stale in F15 now.  Are you seeing this with the latest 2.6.40.x updates?

Comment 5 John Kissane 2011-11-04 09:15:05 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> For those of you seeing this with RHEL 6.x, you should really file a bug
> against the RHEL product family.
> 
> John, the 2.6.38 kernel is fairly stale in F15 now.  Are you seeing this with
> the latest 2.6.40.x updates?

Haven't seen it is a while Josh so could well be fixed in 2.6.40.x.

Comment 6 Dave Jones 2011-12-06 19:05:43 UTC
reopen (or file new bug) if it reappears. thanks for the update.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.