Hide Forgot
Created attachment 511302 [details] vdsm log Description of problem: on a large scale system - 1583 Lvs and 67 pvs - 36 active sds and 47 general refreshStoragePool take 4.5 minutes. Thread-39379::INFO::2011-07-05 12:41:24,703::dispatcher::94::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: refreshStoragePool, args: ( spUUID=aa2b15e3-2e59-4772-84d7-28964c81677f msdUUID=e3fe53b2-8925-4f59-b522-3421da02b633 masterVersion=1) 12:45:54,878::dispatcher::100::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: refreshStoragePool, Return response: {'status': {'message': 'OK', 'code': 0}} Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): vdsm-4.9-79.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.on this system conditions perform activate storage domain from gui 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
http://gerrit.usersys.redhat.com/#change,662
Bug report changed to ON_QA status by me since Errata System refused to do so. A QE request has been submitted for advisory RHEA-2011:11186-01 http://errata.devel.redhat.com/errata/show/11186
verified on 4.9-81. refreshStoragePool operation was shortened drastically after above fix, and now it stands on 2 sec. attached some logs to prove: Thread-417::INFO::2011-07-19 15:08:27,844::dispatcher::94::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: refreshStoragePool, args: ( spUUID=7bc55a62-937d-4c96-b65c-641ff41b9602 msdUUID=4364b7a5-1b36-41f4-bfd7-ff10825754f8 masterVersion=1) Thread-417::INFO::2011-07-19 15:08:29,558::dispatcher::100::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: refreshStoragePool, Return response: {'status': {'message': 'OK', 'code': 0}} Thread-494::INFO::2011-07-19 15:10:19,886::dispatcher::94::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: refreshStoragePool, args: ( spUUID=7bc55a62-937d-4c96-b65c-641ff41b9602 msdUUID=4364b7a5-1b36-41f4-bfd7-ff10825754f8 masterVersion=1) Thread-494::INFO::2011-07-19 15:10:21,534::dispatcher::100::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: refreshStoragePool, Return response: {'status': {'message': 'OK', 'code': 0}} Thread-712::INFO::2011-07-19 15:15:55,213::dispatcher::94::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: refreshStoragePool, args: ( spUUID=7bc55a62-937d-4c96-b65c-641ff41b9602 msdUUID=4364b7a5-1b36-41f4-bfd7-ff10825754f8 masterVersion=1) Thread-712::INFO::2011-07-19 15:15:56,872::dispatcher::100::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: refreshStoragePool, Return response: {'status': {'message': 'OK', 'code': 0}} Thread-728::INFO::2011-07-19 15:16:17,359::dispatcher::94::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: refreshStoragePool, args: ( spUUID=7bc55a62-937d-4c96-b65c-641ff41b9602 msdUUID=4364b7a5-1b36-41f4-bfd7-ff10825754f8 masterVersion=1) Thread-728::INFO::2011-07-19 15:16:19,708::dispatcher::100::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: refreshStoragePool, Return response: {'status': {'message': 'OK', 'code': 0}} Thread-788::INFO::2011-07-19 15:17:38,806::dispatcher::94::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: refreshStoragePool, args: ( spUUID=7bc55a62-937d-4c96-b65c-641ff41b9602 msdUUID=4364b7a5-1b36-41f4-bfd7-ff10825754f8 masterVersion=1) Thread-788::INFO::2011-07-19 15:17:40,531::dispatcher::100::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: refreshStoragePool, Return response: {'status': {'message': 'OK', 'code': 0}} Thread-803::INFO::2011-07-19 15:17:55,570::dispatcher::94::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) Run and protect: refreshStoragePool, args: ( spUUID=7bc55a62-937d-4c96-b65c-641ff41b9602 msdUUID=4364b7a5-1b36-41f4-bfd7-ff10825754f8 masterVersion=1)
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1782.html