Bug 720356 - Review Request: rubygem-rack-ssl - Force SSL/TLS in your app
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-ssl - Force SSL/TLS in your app
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-07-11 13:54 UTC by Vít Ondruch
Modified: 2011-10-17 13:19 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-10-17 13:19:54 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
bkabrda: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda 2011-10-14 08:24:06 UTC
I'm taking this one.

Comment 2 Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda 2011-10-14 08:35:18 UTC
- License should be MIT, I don't see any references to GPLv2+ or Ruby in any of the included files.
- Maybe you could alter the way you run tests by moving the -I%{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/lib parameter to RUBYOPT. I think that once you use RUBYOPT, you should place everything in it not to make mess of things.

So after you correct the License tag, this package is APPROVED.

Comment 3 Vít Ondruch 2011-10-17 12:45:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> - License should be MIT, I don't see any references to GPLv2+ or Ruby in any of
> the included files.

Good spot! Thank you.

> - Maybe you could alter the way you run tests by moving the
> -I%{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/lib parameter to RUBYOPT. I think that once you use
> RUBYOPT, you should place everything in it not to make mess of things.

It does make sense. I'll think about it :)

> So after you correct the License tag, this package is APPROVED.


Thank you for your review.



New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: rubygem-rack-ssl
Short Description: Force SSL/TLS in your app
Owners: vondruch
Branches: 
InitialCC:

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2011-10-17 12:49:43 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.