Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 720546

Summary: [WHQL][BSOD]Device Path Exerciser failed -[Job ID - 281]
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Min Deng <mdeng>
Component: virtio-winAssignee: Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.2CC: bcao, dawu, juzhang, michen, qzhang, vrozenfe
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 6.1   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-15 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-09-12 08:57:30 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
BSOD screenshot
none
Dump Analysis
none
Latest dump analysis none

Description Min Deng 2011-07-12 02:27:59 UTC
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Configure WHQL testing environment
2.Run jobs on DTM 
  
Actual results:
The job hangs  


Expected results:
The job can pass


Additional info:
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.167.el6.x86_64
2.6.32-164.el6.x86_64
DTM version
1.6.8367.0000

Comment 1 Min Deng 2011-07-12 02:31:38 UTC
Created attachment 512315 [details]
BSOD screenshot

Comment 3 Min Deng 2011-07-12 03:16:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> Guest hit BSOD while doing Device Path Exerciser[Job ID - 281]
> 
> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
  qemu: qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.167.el6.x86_64
> kernel :2.6.32-164.el6.x86_64
> virtio-win-1.2.0-1.el6
> 
> How reproducible:
> Sometimes
> 
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1.Configure WHQL testing environment
> 2.Run jobs on DTM 
> 
> Actual results:
> The job hit BSOD   
> 
> 
> Expected results:
> The job can pass
> 
> 
> Additional info:

> DTM version
> 1.6.8367.0000

Comment 4 Min Deng 2011-07-12 03:27:12 UTC
Created attachment 512319 [details]
Dump Analysis

can provide dump file if necessary.thank you!

Comment 5 Min Deng 2011-07-12 05:15:37 UTC
Comment on attachment 512319 [details]
Dump Analysis

*******************************************************************************

*                                                                             *

*                        Bugcheck Analysis                                    *

*                                                                             *

*******************************************************************************



Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information.



BugCheck 8E, {c0000005, 0, b8a30bc4, 0}



PEB is paged out (Peb.Ldr = 7ffd800c).  Type ".hh dbgerr001" for details

PEB is paged out (Peb.Ldr = 7ffd800c).  Type ".hh dbgerr001" for details

Probably caused by : ntkrpamp.exe ( nt!KiDispatchException+3b1 )



Followup: MachineOwner

---------



1: kd> !analyze -v

*******************************************************************************

*                                                                             *

*                        Bugcheck Analysis                                    *

*                                                                             *

*******************************************************************************



KERNEL_MODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (8e)

This is a very common bugcheck.  Usually the exception address pinpoints

the driver/function that caused the problem.  Always note this address

as well as the link date of the driver/image that contains this address.

Some common problems are exception code 0x80000003.  This means a hard

coded breakpoint or assertion was hit, but this system was booted

/NODEBUG.  This is not supposed to happen as developers should never have

hardcoded breakpoints in retail code, but ...

If this happens, make sure a debugger gets connected, and the

system is booted /DEBUG.  This will let us see why this breakpoint is

happening.

Arguments:

Arg1: c0000005, The exception code that was not handled

Arg2: 00000000, The address that the exception occurred at

Arg3: b8a30bc4, Trap Frame

Arg4: 00000000



Debugging Details:

------------------



PEB is paged out (Peb.Ldr = 7ffd800c).  Type ".hh dbgerr001" for details

PEB is paged out (Peb.Ldr = 7ffd800c).  Type ".hh dbgerr001" for details



EXCEPTION_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s.



FAULTING_IP: 

+0

00000000 ??              ???



TRAP_FRAME:  b8a30bc4 -- (.trap 0xffffffffb8a30bc4)

ErrCode = 00000010

eax=8a2faf00 ebx=00000000 ecx=8a2fa000 edx=00000100 esi=89bc7478 edi=b8a30c88

eip=00000000 esp=b8a30c38 ebp=b8a30c4c iopl=0         nv up ei ng nz na pe nc

cs=0008  ss=0010  ds=0023  es=0023  fs=0030  gs=0000             efl=00010286

00000000 ??              ???

Resetting default scope



DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID:  INTEL_CPU_MICROCODE_ZERO



BUGCHECK_STR:  0x8E



PROCESS_NAME:  devpathexer.exe



LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER:  from 804fe817 to 804f9f33



STACK_TEXT:  

b8a3078c 804fe817 0000008e c0000005 00000000 nt!KeBugCheckEx+0x1b

b8a30b54 80542085 b8a30b70 00000000 b8a30bc4 nt!KiDispatchException+0x3b1

b8a30bbc 80542036 b8a30c4c 00000000 badb0d00 nt!CommonDispatchException+0x4d

b8a30c4c 8065f5d3 b8a30c74 89bc7478 00000000 nt!KiExceptionExit+0x18a

b8a30c6c 806585bb 00000000 00000000 89bc7478 nt!VerifierIoAllocateIrp1+0x3f

b8a30ca4 8057c2bf 00000004 00000001 b8a30d64 nt!IovAllocateIrp+0x1d

b8a30d48 8054161c 000039a0 00c1ff74 00b14cd0 nt!NtSetVolumeInformationFile+0x1cb

b8a30d48 7c90e4f4 000039a0 00c1ff74 00b14cd0 nt!KiFastCallEntry+0xfc

WARNING: Frame IP not in any known module. Following frames may be wrong.

00c1ff8c 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x7c90e4f4





STACK_COMMAND:  kb



FOLLOWUP_IP: 

nt!KiDispatchException+3b1

804fe817 cc              int     3



SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX:  1



SYMBOL_NAME:  nt!KiDispatchException+3b1



FOLLOWUP_NAME:  MachineOwner



MODULE_NAME: nt



IMAGE_NAME:  ntkrpamp.exe



DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP:  4802516a



FAILURE_BUCKET_ID:  0x8E_VRF_nt!KiDispatchException+3b1



BUCKET_ID:  0x8E_VRF_nt!KiDispatchException+3b1



Followup: MachineOwner

---------

Comment 6 Min Deng 2011-07-12 05:18:34 UTC
Created attachment 512328 [details]
Latest dump analysis

Comment 8 Vadim Rozenfeld 2011-07-12 07:24:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 512319 [details]
> Dump Analysis
> 
> can provide dump file if necessary.thank you!

Yes, please.
Thank you,
Vadim.

Comment 11 Min Deng 2011-08-29 04:48:06 UTC
Hi Vadim,

   QE cannot reproduce the issue via the virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-15

Thanks
Min

Comment 12 Vadim Rozenfeld 2011-09-12 08:57:30 UTC
(In reply to comment #11)
> Hi Vadim,
> 
>    QE cannot reproduce the issue via the virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-15
> 
> Thanks
> Min

Thank you, Min.

Closing this bug.

Best regards,
Vadim.