Hide Forgot
Created attachment 513844 [details] ss1 Description of problem: Putting this on the blocker for now, but would not object at all to this going in next release! I've attached two screenshots for List view https://hp-dl180g6-01.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com/conductor/pools -> deployments and List view https://hp-dl180g6-01.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com/conductor/pools/1 I would be nice if a user could delete more than one deployment at a time using these menus [root@hp-dl180g6-01 ~]# rpm -qa | grep aeolus aeolus-conductor-doc-0.3.0-0.el6.20110718142517git4cd3a5e.noarch aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.3.0-0.el6.20110718142517git4cd3a5e.noarch rubygem-aeolus-image-0.0.1-1.el6.20110718142517git4cd3a5e.noarch aeolus-all-0.3.0-0.el6.20110718142517git4cd3a5e.noarch aeolus-conductor-0.3.0-0.el6.20110718142517git4cd3a5e.noarch aeolus-configure-2.0.1-0.el6.20110718092611gitdc7eac0.noarch
Created attachment 513845 [details] ss2
making sure all the bugs are at the right version for future queries
Deleting multiple deployments is available from commit 485908d5133bdc399b670b7a5c3e878e328df87b
Deleting multiple deployments is possible and works. see attached screenshot. verified on: [root@nec-em6 templates]# rpm -qa | grep aeolus aeolus-conductor-doc-0.5.0-0.20111018184108gitf5c4fc6.fc15.noarch aeolus-all-0.5.0-0.20111018184108gitf5c4fc6.fc15.noarch rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.1.0-3.20111003133323git9451323.fc15.noarch aeolus-configure-2.2.0-1.20111007151942git26136f2.fc15.noarch aeolus-conductor-0.5.0-0.20111018184108gitf5c4fc6.fc15.noarch aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.5.0-0.20111018184108gitf5c4fc6.fc15.noarch rubygem-aeolus-image-0.1.0-3.20111003170706git8f23238.fc15.noarch
Created attachment 529226 [details] multiple deployment deletion
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0583.html