Bug 724210 (BRMS-153) - RulebasePartitioningTest test failure
Summary: RulebasePartitioningTest test failure
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: BRMS-153
Product: JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5
Classification: JBoss
Component: unspecified
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: 5.0.1
Assignee: Mark Proctor
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/BRM...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-07-07 12:49 UTC by nwallace
Modified: 2009-10-07 05:12 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-09-01 12:17:58 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker BRMS-153 0 None None None Never

Description nwallace 2009-07-07 12:49:13 UTC
Date of First Response: 2009-09-10 00:22:55
securitylevel_name: Public

unit test failure when building MR2 source code 
This works if config.setMultithreadEvaluation( true ); line commented out

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test set: org.drools.integrationtests.RulebasePartitioningTest
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.15 sec <<< FAILURE!
testRulebasePartitions1(org.drools.integrationtests.RulebasePartitioningTest)  Time elapsed: 0.14 sec  <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<3> but was:<0>
    at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
    at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:282)
    at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64)
    at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:201)
    at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:207)
    at org.drools.integrationtests.RulebasePartitioningTest.testRulebasePartitions1(RulebasePartitioningTest.java:82)

Comment 1 nwallace 2009-07-07 12:50:34 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is related to JBRULES-1867


Comment 2 nwallace 2009-09-01 12:17:58 UTC
Fix in place.

Comment 3 David Le Sage 2009-09-10 04:22:55 UTC
For the errata in the release notes, we require details of:

The CAUSE (what was actually broken)

The FIX (what was changed to eliminate this bug) and 

CONSEQUENCES of the fix (how this benefits users.)


Dot point explanations are fine.

Comment 4 David Le Sage 2009-09-23 05:24:53 UTC
We are still awaiting the outstanding information for the Release Notes on this one.  Please provide it as soon as possible. Thanks.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.