Bug 724323 (BRMS-268) - Mortgages example rules broken
Summary: Mortgages example rules broken
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: BRMS-268
Product: JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5
Classification: JBoss
Component: Examples
Version: 5.0.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: 5.0.2
Assignee: Jervis Liu
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/BRM...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-03-17 12:31 UTC by Jaroslaw Kijanowski
Modified: 2013-11-07 22:09 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-04-21 11:39:27 UTC
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Screenshot.png (62.08 KB, image/png)
2010-03-17 12:34 UTC, Jaroslaw Kijanowski 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker BRMS-268 0 None Closed Mortgages example rules broken 2011-08-23 06:36:53 UTC

Description Jaroslaw Kijanowski 2010-03-17 12:31:13 UTC 
Date of First Response: 2010-03-31 03:19:02
securitylevel_name: Public

I have a fresh repo, install the mortgages sample (when asked after logging in).
Go to Knowledge Bases -> mortgages -> Business rule assets -> Bankruptcy history

The THEN part has "Set value of explanation" but the value is empty. If you press 'View Source" you will notice that the explanation is set:

a.setExplanation( "has been bankrupt" );

Present also in other rules (no NINJAs, Underage, No bad credit checks).

CheckBoxDslRule is empty and this has been reported in GUVNOR-393.

This is not a regression.
Comment 1 Jaroslaw Kijanowski 2010-03-17 12:34:10 UTC 
Attachment: Added: Screenshot.png
Comment 2 Dana Mison 2010-03-31 07:19:02 UTC 
Need clarification on this JIRA for the release notes:

In the rule samples referred to above (Bankruptcy History, No Ninjas, Underage and no bad credit checks) setExplanation did not display the textbox & value in the guided editor although it does appear correctly in the source.

Does this only affect the samples?  If you add this into the rule from the guided editor it seems to work ok.

Are there other scenarios that users will encounter this with ?

I am still seeing this behavior in CR1 so I am unsure as to how to document this further
Comment 3 Jaroslaw Kijanowski 2010-03-31 07:24:38 UTC 
This should be fixed in CR2.
Comment 4 Jervis Liu 2010-03-31 12:28:20 UTC 
This issue has been fixed in CR2. It only affects samples. There is no other scenario that users may encounter this.
Comment 5 Jaroslaw Kijanowski 2010-04-21 11:39:27 UTC 
verified in 5.0.2 CR2
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.