Bug 724446 (BRMS-391) - Discussion comment line breaks are ignored
Summary: Discussion comment line breaks are ignored
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: BRMS-391
Product: JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5
Classification: JBoss
Component: BRM (Guvnor)
Version: 5.1.0.ER2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: 5.1.0.ER2
Assignee: Tihomir Surdilovic
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/BRM...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-10-15 19:39 UTC by Jiri Locker
Modified: 2010-11-09 14:23 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-03 20:14:44 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)
multiline_comment_1.png (164.22 KB, image/png)
2010-10-15 20:23 UTC, Jiri Locker
no flags Details
multiline_comment_2.png (166.30 KB, image/png)
2010-10-15 20:23 UTC, Jiri Locker
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 724481 0 high CLOSED Atom feeds need to escape XML special characters 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker BRMS-391 0 None None None Never

Internal Links: 724481

Description Jiri Locker 2010-10-15 19:39:21 UTC
securitylevel_name: Public

When one wants to put a more extensive comment to the asset it is desirable to be able to give the text structure by line breaking. The "textarea" element used to create a comment is a multi-line text field, which allows to input new lines, but after submitting the comment line breaks are forgotten, which is unexpected.

Comment 1 Jiri Locker 2010-10-15 20:23:06 UTC
Attachment: Added: multiline_comment_1.png
Attachment: Added: multiline_comment_2.png


Comment 2 Tihomir Surdilovic 2010-10-19 17:43:11 UTC
Link: Added: This issue depends GUVNOR-676


Comment 3 Tihomir Surdilovic 2010-10-19 17:51:03 UTC
Done

Comment 4 Jiri Locker 2010-11-04 21:01:14 UTC
Link: Added: This issue related BRMS-426


Comment 5 Jiri Locker 2010-11-09 14:23:26 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is a dependency of JBQA-3766



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.