Hide Forgot
securitylevel_name: Public Security exception thrown on brms.war due to jboss-as-web/server/production/deploy/jboss-brms.war/WEB-INF/classes/org/jboss/seam/security/permission/RoleBasedPermissionResolver.class not being signed 2010-12-08 15:27:52,664 INFO [org.jboss.web.tomcat.service.deployers.TomcatDeployment] (main) deploy, ctxPath=/jboss-brms 2010-12-08 15:27:55,864 WARN [org.jboss.detailed.classloader.ClassLoaderManager] (main) Unexpected error during load of:org.jboss.seam.security.permission.PermissionResolver java.lang.SecurityException: class "org.jboss.seam.security.permission.PermissionResolver"'s signer information does not match signer information of other classes in the same package
moved RoleBasedPermissionResolver to the org.drools.guvnor.client.security.permission package which should fix this. please note that this fix requires a change in the documentation -> in components.xml from now on to configure role-based authentication it is no longer: <security:role-based-permission-resolver enable-role-based-authorization="false" /> but <component name="org.jboss.seam.security.roleBasedPermissionResolver"> <property name="enableRoleBasedAuthorization">false</property> </component> where the value can be false (default) or true for users to set role based auth to true.
Assigning to Neil to make sure he can sign the jars now
Link: Added: This issue related GUVNOR-1120
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: Doc as known issue
Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. Diffed Contents: @@ -1 +1 @@ -Doc as known issue+Need release note
Doc bug raised to amend components.xml in the admin guide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732613 for future reference if documentation is required, please raise a docs bug.
Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. Diffed Contents: @@ -1 +1,3 @@ -Need release note+https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724559 + +The signed standalone version of BRMS was failing to start due to a security exception in brms.war, the RoleBasePermissionResolver.class was moved to the org.drools.guvnor.client.security.permission package which resolved the issue.
Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. Diffed Contents: @@ -1,3 +1 @@ -https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724559 - The signed standalone version of BRMS was failing to start due to a security exception in brms.war, the RoleBasePermissionResolver.class was moved to the org.drools.guvnor.client.security.permission package which resolved the issue.